TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cisco Modeling Labs (formerly VIRL) vs. SecureCRT

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cisco Modeling Labs (formerly VIRL)

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ACisco Modeling Labs (formerly VIRL) is a complete network simulation platform for testing, training, and learning.N/A

    SecureCRT

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/ASecureCRT provides secure remote access, file transfer, and data tunneling for everyone in your organizatiom.N/A
    Pricing
    Cisco Modeling Labs (formerly VIRL)SecureCRT
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cisco Modeling Labs (formerly VIRL)SecureCRT
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsContact vendor for pricing information.Contact vendor for pricing/licensing information
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    Cisco Modeling Labs (formerly VIRL)SecureCRT
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.7
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.3
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cisco Modeling Labs (formerly VIRL)SecureCRT
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cisco
    Cisco VIRL/CML is obviously very well suited if you want to lab practically any Cisco based network platform. It does a fantastic job of supporting almost all feature sets in a production appliance. It may not be the best option if you require a very multi-vendor intensive solution for labbing purposes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VanDyke Software
    SecureCRT is well-suited for anyone who maintains and operates a large number of devices or needs access to many systems. It makes connecting to these systems easy, rather than having to find or remember node names, IP addresses, login credentials, etc. This applies even to smaller device counts, as it just keeps the organization and connections simple to access.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cisco
    • It allows for labbing complex environment topologies
    • Interconnecting virtual nodes, which emulate network appliances, is extremely easy and intuitive
    • Assuming you meet the minimum hardware requirements to run the virtual images, the nodes run relatively fast
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VanDyke Software
    • Multiple sessions at same time
    • support for SSH and Telnet
    • creating folders and organizing your infrastructure devices.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cisco
    • Better support for multi-vendor labs. Since Cisco VIRLs uses KVM as its hypervisor, not all vendor images will be fully supported in the Cisco VIRL/CML environment. For these particular use cases, it's sometimes better to use GNS3 or EVE-NG.
    • Since there are several free offerings out there that allow you to emulate network appliances (especially Cisco IOS based devices), I would love to see Cisco offer more cost-effective alternatives to engineers over their current pricing model.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VanDyke Software
    • Licensing price need to be checked again
    • changes UI for modern look and feel
    • adding more scripts options
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Cisco
    Cisco VIRL is a great network environment emulation tool when it comes to Cisco devices. However, I have run into some issues when trying to integrate other vendors virtual images into the Cisco VIRL/CML environment. For those specific use cases, I have had better luck with other emulation platforms like EVE-NG.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VanDyke Software
    it is best for network management but it have some improvement expected
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cisco
    Cisco VIRL/CML provides a similar emulation environment to GNS3 and EVE-NG but I would argue that it's the best when it specifically comes to Cisco network appliances. This is because you will have access to latest Cisco virtual images with the best support in regards to current feature sets. If you run into any issues, you can also get support from Cisco. The same can't be said about free emulation programs like GNS3 or EVE-NG. However, when it comes to multi-vendor labbing, I have found better success with EVE-NG.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VanDyke Software
    SecureCRT can be configured for more than just remote desktop connections. I store RDP sessions, CLI interfaces, and FTP connections in the application.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cisco
    • It has allowed me to avoid mistakes when implementing changes on Cisco devices
    • It has allowed me to better plan new network change implementations
    • It has allowed me to be more confident in my network designs by providing me with a predictive model where I can gauge the effect that certain changes and new technology features will have on my network
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VanDyke Software
    • Quickly connects to systems, especially in emergencies.
    • Spend less time maintaining spreadsheets and getting them opened, finding the device, and then copying the information over to access the system.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots