Cisco Multicloud Defense vs. Cloudlytics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Multicloud Defense
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
A solution to simplify security and gain multidirectional protection across any public or private cloud to block inbound attacks, lateral movement, and data exfiltration using a single solution. Cisco Multicloud Defense protects all cloud environments using a single software-as-a-service (SaaS) control plane, eliminating inefficient, complex, and costly point solutions.N/A
Cloudlytics
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$249
per month
Pricing
Cisco Multicloud DefenseCloudlytics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$249
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Multicloud DefenseCloudlytics
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Multicloud DefenseCloudlytics
Considered Both Products
Cisco Multicloud Defense
Chose Cisco Multicloud Defense
Compared with alternatives, it offers better visibility, consistent security policies, and easier management across the cloud environment.
Chose Cisco Multicloud Defense
As mentioned on the previous comments, Ease of use, Saved a lot of operational overhead compared to other products.
Chose Cisco Multicloud Defense
Cisco Multicloud Defense, Crowd Strike Falcon, and Arctic Wolf Cloud Posture Security Management System as a service SAAS platforms are very comparable platforms. Unfortunately for Croud Strike, they had a mishap recently that caused major downtime for many companies worldwide. …
Chose Cisco Multicloud Defense
Virtual Firewalling solutions are a traditional way of bringing your own security into the cloud. Multi cloud defense is a new way that is cloud native.
Chose Cisco Multicloud Defense
The ease of use, analytics, and just overall security feature set of Cisco Multicloud Defense is hard to beat. Their product is very intriguing and quite a bit similar. However, I have learned from past experiences that you get what you pay for. Cisco may be a little more …
Chose Cisco Multicloud Defense
I come from a deployment background, so I've used most of the vendor's firewall technologies. In the cloud, I've primarily used Cisco's legacy Firepower product. It doesn't really parallel with them in that it's not a traditional firewall appliance sitting in the cloud. Its …
Cloudlytics

No answer on this topic

Features
Cisco Multicloud DefenseCloudlytics
Cloud Computing Security Features
Comparison of Cloud Computing Security Features features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Multicloud Defense
8.7
Ratings
5% above category average
Cloudlytics
-
Ratings
Automated Data Backup and Recovery8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Intrusion Detection and Prevention:8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Regular Vulnerability Management8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Identity and Access Management8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Secure Data Transfer8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Security Incident Response8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance and Auditing9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Multicloud DefenseCloudlytics
Small Businesses
Armor
Armor
Score 6.0 out of 10
Armor
Armor
Score 6.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Multicloud DefenseCloudlytics
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Multicloud DefenseCloudlytics
Likelihood to Recommend
Any connection to a cloud platform would benefit from Cisco Multicloud Defense. The dynamic security policies that you can create based on where the connections are coming from and not something that can be changed, for example, an IP address, makes the solution very adaptable. Classification of risky traffic and the destination of the flow is very intriguing. Even just knowing the flow of traffic that is deemed benign would provide useful insight to businesses to determine where their platforms and applications are being used.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Protecting the Egress Internet traffic
  • Ease of Policy Changes
  • Ease of gateway image roll outs
  • Single Controller to manage multiple environments and Multiple clouds
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Logs can be tricky to navigate
  • GUI can sometimes be confusing
  • Wish there was a better sizing recommendation for gateway deployments
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
If it maintains its current direction it will be very disruptive in the cloud security space
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It provides a centralized and easy-to-manage platform for securing multiple cloud environments.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
As of yet I havent logged a TAC case - It will be interesting to see how it is supported as a new product in the medium term
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Compared with alternatives, it offers better visibility, consistent security policies, and easier management across the cloud environment.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • It requires good knowledge of the product at the start, so it can take time and Cisco resources for help with setting it up.
  • Analise data going to websites/web servers which can help to block some unwanted traffic.
  • Easy to monitor what is happening after implementation due to nice dashboards which are fully customisable.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots