Cisco Secure Workload vs. Snyk

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cisco Secure Workload	Score9.1 out of 10	N/A	The Cisco Secure Workload (formerly Tetration) platform offers holistic workload protection for multicloud data centers by enabling a zero-trust model using segmentation. This approach allows users to identify security incidents faster, contain lateral movement, and reduce the attack surface. Tetration's infrastructure-agnostic approach supports both on-premises and public cloud workloads.	N/A
Snyk	Score8.6 out of 10	N/A	Snyk’s Developer Security Platform automatically integrates with a developer’s workflow and helps security teams to collaborate with their development teams. It boasts a developer-first approach that ensures organizations can secure all of the critical components of their applications from code to cloud, driving developer productivity, revenue growth, customer satisfaction, cost savings and an improved security posture. The vendor states Snyk is used by 1,200 customers worldwide today, including…	$0

Cisco Secure Workload software is licensed based on the number of workload equivalents or devices (endpoints) depending on the agent or sensor type being used. Telemetry data can be collected using agents, supported by other supported sensors or collectors, in any combination. Policy enforcement is enabled through agents with enforcement capability with infrastructure enforcement delivered through Cisco Secure Firewall Integration, Application Delivery Controllers (ADCs), and Security Groups in public cloud infrastructure or orchestrated via streamed Kafka policy. Workload is defined as a virtual machine, bare-metal server, or container host and includes server and desktop operating systems.

Pricing is dependent on the number of developers selected, the number of products selected, and the payment term selected. Please visit the Snyk plans page for an interactive pricing calculator.

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Cisco Secure Workload	Snyk
Considered Both Products	Cisco No answer on this topic	Snyk No answer on this topic
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	100% Would buy again 6 Answers
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	100% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	Cisco Secure Workload	Snyk
Likelihood to Recommend	7.3 (1 ratings)	8.5 (6 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (2 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Cisco Secure Workload	Snyk
Likelihood to Recommend	Cisco The biggest challenge with this product is it crosses lines. You need somebody who can support servers as well as somebody who supports the infrastructure. And that's usually two different jobs, two different job titles, two different departments. So if you have a lot of silos within your organization and you have groups that don't work particularly well together between the server team and the network team, you will have problems developing and working on this product. If your server team and your network team work well together, then you'll have a lot fewer problems, it'll work pretty well. But if your server team and your network team are like oil and water don't bother. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	Snyk Scenarios Where Snyk Is Well-Suited CI/CD Pipeline Integration (Node.js, Python, etc.) Container Security Open Source License Compliance Infrastructure as Code (IaC) SecurityScenarios Where Snyk May Be Less Appropriate Scanning Proprietary or Custom Code for Unknown Vulnerabilities Complex Monorepos with Custom Build Tools Organizations Requiring Custom Security Rules Advanced Security Teams Needing Correlation and Deep Triage. Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Pros	Cisco No answers on this topic	Snyk Helps in dependency management SAST - Static Application Security Testing Infra Code Scan ( Terraform , Cloud Formation , Docker image scan) OSSG Incentivized Manas Singh IT Architect Read full review
Cons	Cisco No answers on this topic	Snyk The tool itself has many capabilities but using them operationally within the platform on a day to day basis for managing vulnerabilities is not a good experience. Our company was in desparate need of a tool to help us manage vulnerabilities so we could achieve a SOC 2 assurance report without findings. Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Usability	Cisco No answers on this topic	Snyk Developer-Centric Design - Snyk integrates directly into IDEs (like VS Code and IntelliJ), CI/CD pipelines, GitHub/GitLab, and container registries. Clear, Actionable Vulnerability report issues are categorized by severity. Reports include fix recommendations, pull request suggestions, and links to remediation advice. Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Cisco No answers on this topic	Snyk Unfortunately, neither cover all of the use cases that we would like so we need to use both but they are both excellent tools as part of our vulnerability management. We find that Snyk helps us better with improving our MTTR of identified vulnerabilities when compared to inspector but that may be more based on how we have implemented both tools Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Return on Investment	Cisco No answers on this topic	Snyk Increased developer experience Better productivity due to shift left as Vulnerabilities are caught earlier in the SDLC process Improved Vulnerability Management Common dashboard for various stages in CI/CD Incentivized Manas Singh IT Architect Read full review
ScreenShots	Cisco Secure Workload Screenshots

Cisco Secure Workload vs. Snyk

Cisco Secure Workload

Snyk

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

Cisco Secure Workload Screenshots