Cisco SecureX vs. IBM Security QRadar EDR
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisco SecureX | Score7 out of 10 | N/A | Cisco Threat Response automates integrations across select Cisco Security products and accelerates key security operations functions: detection, investigation, and remediation. Threat Response integrates threat intelligence from Cisco Talos and third-party sources, which adds context from integrated Cisco Security products automatically so you know instantly which of your systems was targeted and how. | N/A |
IBM Security QRadar EDR | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users… | N/A |
| Cisco SecureX | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cisco SecureX | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 11 Answers | 100% Would buy again 11 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
91% Delivers good value for the price 10 Answers | 88% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
91% Happy with the feature set 10 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 11 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
90% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 9 Answers | 88% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
90% Implementation went as expected 9 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 9 Answers | |
| Cisco SecureX | IBM Security QRadar EDR | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cisco SecureX | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Microsoft Defender XDR Score8.7 out of 10 | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() InsightIDR Score8.5 out of 10 | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Microsoft Defender XDR Score8.7 out of 10 | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cisco SecureX | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.1 | 7.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Cisco SecureX | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Security QRadar EDR Screenshots |










