Cisco Storage Area Networking vs. IBM SAN768B
Cisco Storage Area Networking vs. IBM SAN768B
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisco Storage Area Networking | N/A | The vendor states that the Cisco MDS 9000 multilayer SAN switches can help lower the total cost of ownership (TCO) of storage environments. They combine what the vendor describes as a robust, flexible hardware architecture with multiple layers of network and storage-management intelligence. With them, users can build highly available, scalable storage networks with advanced security and unified management. | N/A | |
![]() IBM SAN768B | N/A | IBM's SAN768B is a SAN option. | N/A |
| Cisco Storage Area Networking | IBM SAN768B | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Storage Area Networking | IBM SAN768B |
|---|
| Cisco Storage Area Networking | IBM SAN768B | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | NetApp FAS Storage Arrays Score 9.5 out of 10 | NetApp FAS Storage Arrays Score 9.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | NetApp AFF A-Series Score 8.8 out of 10 | NetApp AFF A-Series Score 8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cisco Storage Area Networking | IBM SAN768B | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.1 (3 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Performance | 10.0 (3 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | 9.0 (3 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Cisco Storage Area Networking | IBM SAN768B | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() Cisco
| ![]() IBM No answers on this topic |
| Pros | ![]() Cisco
| ![]() IBM No answers on this topic |
| Cons | ![]() Cisco
| ![]() IBM No answers on this topic |
| Performance | ![]() Cisco
| ![]() IBM No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Cisco
| ![]() IBM No answers on this topic |
| Scalability | ![]() Cisco
| ![]() IBM No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | ![]() Cisco
| ![]() IBM No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots |



