CloudDRIVE vs. (EOL) Cisco CloudCenter

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CloudDRIVE
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
CSS Corp in Milpitas, California offers CloudDRIVE, a cloud management platform designed to optimize application performance and reduce costs post cloud migration, and smooth adoption of new cloud capabilities and applications.N/A
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Cisco CloudCenter (formerly CliQr CloudCenter) was an application-defined cloud management platform for deploying and administration of applications across datacenters, private, and public cloud resources. It has been discontinued by Cisco, and is no longer available for sale.N/A
Pricing
CloudDRIVE(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CloudDRIVE(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
CloudDRIVE(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
Small Businesses
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.6 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Rubrik
Rubrik
Score 8.9 out of 10
Rubrik
Rubrik
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Rubrik
Rubrik
Score 8.9 out of 10
Rubrik
Rubrik
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CloudDRIVE(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
CloudDRIVE(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
Likelihood to Recommend
CSS Corp
It seems to be adequate for those companies that have a lot of information and have the need for many of their workers to integrate or can visualize their information quickly and at any time. It helps to save space on the company's servers and it is very easy to access, it is also easy to use and understand, and it is a scalable storage system
Read full review
Cisco
It is well suited for large corporate entities, whether they are in manufacturing, sales, engineering, healthcare, supply or shipping. It is easy to understand and operate once it has been initially configured. Expansion of the system is likewise easy to do once expertise has been acquired. The only difficulty with this or any cloud scenario is ensuring where the data is located and managing that securely.
Read full review
Pros
CSS Corp
  • Keeps my information safe in the cloud which is safer
  • I can view my information from any device at any place and time
  • With this application, I can transfer the data with ease
  • Automatic backup of all files is performed
Read full review
Cisco
  • We are able to automate deployment which has been a strength to the geographical distribution of the enterprise.
  • We have been able to work with a wider variety of developer tools and haven't had to customize to fit CloudCenter.
  • It is easier for us to allocate space and allow users to take advantage of the system directly with a minimum of overhead.
Read full review
Cons
CSS Corp
  • Internet access is needed at all times
  • If many people manage the cloud they can make the mistake of deleting some files
  • Confusing legal coverage, there are countries that do not have data protection laws
Read full review
Cisco
  • The software and systems don't present a problem to us but the continued interaction with mid-level support teams and vendors can slow down implementation or correction of difficulties we experience.
  • The continued overhead associated with peripheral training on systems we have purchased can cause delays.
  • Language barriers sometimes show up but this, again, is due to remote middle agents that are themselves contractors of or sales agents of the main agency. It slows down communication and can introduce business difficulties.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CSS Corp
Basically this cloud is much more practical than others, it is fast and have greater storage capacity, but in reality, almost all cloud applications have the same function.
Read full review
Cisco
We found that the cost advantages were greater by going with Cisco because of our present contracts and the materials and equipment we already had on hand. The reliability of the system, for us, outweighed any cost advantages we might have been realized by going with another provider. Certainly the service and support for the entire system is much better when handled by a single vendor with a good track record.
Read full review
Return on Investment
CSS Corp
  • Reduction of expenses in the company
  • A lot of capacity to keep information
  • You can store any type of file
  • It could improve if you could see files without internet
  • Sometimes a little slow
Read full review
Cisco
  • We have had a positive return on investment by adopting Cisco CloudCenter as the system is more mature than competitors. We have saved a lot by working with them rather than continuing to act as a defacto test location for other systems.
  • We have been able to reduce the number of staff necessary to operate the system and turn them over to more profitable work.
  • One negative impact we have seen is that it is difficult to map where the data is located at any specific instance.
Read full review
ScreenShots