CloudQuell vs. ProsperOps

ProsperOps

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
CloudQuell	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	CloudQuell is a cost management platform built for teams whose spend no longer sits in one place. It ingests AWS billing data daily through a scoped read-only cross-account IAM role, and connects OpenAI, Anthropic, and Snowflake. It supports cost centers, allocation rules, tags, and multi-account cost views so spend can be attributed to the team or product that caused it. Anomaly detection, budgets, alert delivery, and ranked savings recommendations help teams identify cost issues and…	$99 per month Flat Rate
ProsperOps	Score 9.1 out of 10	N/A	ProsperOps is a fully automated, multi-cloud cost optimization platform for AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Eliminating cloud waste and managing spend is one of the most persistent challenges for FinOps teams. Cloud usage is inherently elastic, but the financial instruments used to manage cost like Reserved Instances, Savings Plans, and Committed Use Discounts are rigid. ProsperOps bridges this gap by integrating automated rate optimization with intelligent workload…	N/A

Pricing

CloudQuell

ProsperOps

Editions & Modules

Free: $0
per month Flat Rate
Starter: $99
per month Flat Rate
Growth: $199
per month Flat Rate

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
CloudQuell	ProsperOps
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

Pricing is a flat fee, not a percentage of cloud spend. Monthly or annual billing is available, with annual billing providing approximately 17% savings (Starter $990/year, Growth $1,990/year). Every organization can use the free plan for under $10K/month of tracked cloud spend. Paid plans include a 14-day free trial with no credit card required and are self-serve with no sales call.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	CloudQuell	ProsperOps

Best Alternatives
	CloudQuell	ProsperOps
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	IBM Turbonomic Score 8.6 out of 10	IBM Turbonomic Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises	vRealize Operations (discontinued) Score 8.9 out of 10	vRealize Operations (discontinued) Score 8.9 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	CloudQuell	ProsperOps
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	CloudQuell	ProsperOps
Likelihood to Recommend	CloudQuell No answers on this topic	ProsperOps Our firm spends the majority of its cloud budget on EC2 instances, Fargate deployments, and Lambda executions. Automated modifications to discount portfolios based on changes in workloads allow ProsperOops to handle our shifting workloads with ease. In order to meet our net cloud budget requirements, it always follows a high-quality SP (Savings Plan) Portfolio management strategy. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	CloudQuell No answers on this topic	ProsperOps The arbitrage strategy is effective. It's hard to believe how good the service is. It is a plug-and-forget approach for ProsperOps. It costs ProsperOps a percentage of the savings they make. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	CloudQuell No answers on this topic	ProsperOps The inclusion of RDS and Elasticache in cost management is something I'd be all for. When it comes to EC2 capacity reservations, ProsperOps only includes reserved instances in the region where we are located. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	CloudQuell No answers on this topic	ProsperOps To see the aggregated costs on AWS billings, we may purchase the service through AWS Marketplace instead of viewing it in ProsperOps' dashboard. Now that we're using it for AWS, we're talking with our clients about adding it to Microsoft Azure, too, so that we can make use of the tool's cloud cost control and visibility capabilities. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	CloudQuell No answers on this topic	ProsperOps Our Effective Savings Rate has risen since we started using ProsperOps. Our AWS bill savings will cover the cost of the service. As much as 95.4% of our compute on-demand costs are covered by ProsperOps, and all of the savings are put to good use. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	CloudQuell Screenshots	ProsperOps Screenshots