Coda vs. IBM Content Manager OnDemand
Coda vs. IBM Content Manager OnDemand
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
Coda | N/A | Coda, from Coda Project headquartered in San Francisco, is a template-based document generation solution, supporting a variety of use cases presented by the vendor as ideal for smaller companies that might otherwise be relying on spreadsheets to maintain (for instance) product development, or inventory tracking. It is available free, with paid editions to support teams, automations, or for more advanced collaboration and workspace features, as well as more advanced security features. | $0 per month | |
IBM Content Manager OnDemand | N/A | IBM Content Manager OnDemand automatically captures and stores documents, with search and retrieval options. The solution can be deployed on premises or in a secure, single-tenant IBM Cloud® infrastructure. | N/A |
Coda | IBM Content Manager OnDemand | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | With Coda, you only pay for Doc Makers. Often one person creates a doc, others edit it, and some simply observe from afar. Instead of charging for everyone, we only charge for the people who create docs. Interested in enterprise pricing? Visit coda.io/enterprise | — | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
Coda | IBM Content Manager OnDemand | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros | No answers on this topic | |
Top Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
Coda | IBM Content Manager OnDemand | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | Square 9 Softworks Score 9.7 out of 10 | Square 9 Softworks Score 9.7 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | MSB Docs Score 9.6 out of 10 | MSB Docs Score 9.6 out of 10 |
Enterprises | M‑Files Score 9.2 out of 10 | M‑Files Score 9.2 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
Coda | IBM Content Manager OnDemand | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 8.4 (24 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Usability | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Availability | 9.1 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Performance | 9.1 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Support Rating | 7.8 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | 8.2 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Configurability | 8.2 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Ease of integration | 4.5 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Product Scalability | 9.1 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor post-sale | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Coda | IBM Content Manager OnDemand | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | Coda | IBM No answers on this topic |
Pros | Coda | IBM No answers on this topic |
Cons | Coda | IBM No answers on this topic |
Likelihood to Renew | Coda | IBM No answers on this topic |
Usability | Coda | IBM No answers on this topic |
Reliability and Availability | Coda | IBM No answers on this topic |
Performance | Coda | IBM No answers on this topic |
Support Rating | Coda | IBM No answers on this topic |
Implementation Rating | Coda | IBM No answers on this topic |
Alternatives Considered | Coda | IBM No answers on this topic |
Scalability | Coda | IBM No answers on this topic |
Return on Investment | Coda | IBM No answers on this topic |
ScreenShots | Coda Screenshots |