Codacy

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Codacy
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. Saving developers time in code reviews thus efficiently tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS are currently supported. Codacy is static analysis…
$0
Pricing
Codacy
Editions & Modules
Open Source
$0.00
Startup
$0.00
Pro
$15.00
user/mo
Enterprise
$40.00
user/mo
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Codacy
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Codacy
Considered Both Products
Codacy
Chose Codacy
Even though it is paid while SonarQube is free, we chose Codacy because it is simpler to configure and maintain the implemented rules. In addition, it offers support for the main programming languages ​​on the market, ensuring that we can continue to use it if we want to use …
Chose Codacy
Codacy is an amazing and fantastic tool I really like the UI/UX with great amount of customizations around rules for code review. It supports multiple languages like Java, PHP and Python hence making it the best, fast, and easy to get real-time quality codes. The support is …
Chose Codacy
Codacy provides a good support mechanism and has very intuitive UI. Even a newbie can understand the details of a code base. The best part is you don't have to manually update everything. Once you have connected the git repository, it will automatically rate the code and …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Codacy
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Codacy
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(6 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Codacy
Likelihood to Recommend
Codacy
I recommend it for companies that use several programming languages, as it supports several languages ​​such as Java, Javascript, Python, among others. However, for companies that use only one programming language, there are specific tools for each language that can be more complete in this scenario. I do not recommend it for companies that only use open source software, in which case there are other tools available.
Read full review
Pros
Codacy
  • Seamless and easy integrations with GitHub for fantastic pipeline of viewing errors.
  • Intuitive UI which is easy to customize and built-in patterns recommendations and security checks helps to fix issues faster.
  • Metrics and duplication and complexity easily identify areas that need attention to fix it easy.
  • Great for open-source projects.
Read full review
Cons
Codacy
  • There should be customization to get code quality for your own projects if standards are provided.
  • Offline or a standalone application is much needed from Codacy to get local support.
  • Spots a lot of errors and small ones that don't affect much about quality and are de-facto standards.
Read full review
Support Rating
Codacy
Great company and support team!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Codacy
Even though it is paid while SonarQube is free, we chose Codacy because it is simpler to configure and maintain the implemented rules. In addition, it offers support for the main programming languages ​​on the market, ensuring that we can continue to use it if we want to use other languages ​​in new products.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Codacy
  • The integration of Codacy with new code base is quick and easy.
  • Improves our code.
  • Easy to detect errors easily.
  • Ability to check duplicate codes.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Codacy Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of