codeBeamer ALM vs. Cura GRC

In my opinion codeBeamer is well suited for any activity where detailed tracking is needed with teams involved. It can be less suited for small projects which do not last long, or are not continuous, etc

Cura GRC is well suited for automating much of the work associated with documentation, risk management reports, and compliance activities that are most associated with corporate governance and business objectives.

Incentivized

• Tracing of requirements.
• Tracking of development.
• Tracking of QA.
• Tracking of bugs.
• Tracking of releases.
• Wiki.
• Users and teams.
• Works for teams scattered across the globe.
• Testing and coverage for releases.
• Integration with SVN.

• Enables us to better manage business risks and create a safer workplace
• Enables us to manage the risk of loss resulting from inadequate internal processes

Incentivized

• Search.
• Metric calculation.
• Would be nice that cB is a source of truth, i.e., that say SVN commit is done only from cB; know this is difficult to achieve.

• Online support
• It would be great if they offered a mobile version.

Incentivized

Sometimes info in codeBeamer can be lost, in principle, if not well organized by the user, info can never be found, or can be forgotten about, etc

Excellent support professionally. Also, thanks for giving me for free access to SaaS cB for my hobbyist project.

The online support is not so efficient.

Incentivized

codeBeamer is by far better.

• Customer tracking.
• Process tracking.
• Workflow framework.
• Can be overhead.

• Better risk control
• Better financial control

Incentivized