codeBeamer ALM vs. Visure Solutions ALM

In my opinion codeBeamer is well suited for any activity where detailed tracking is needed with teams involved. It can be less suited for small projects which do not last long, or are not continuous, etc

The tool is designed in such a way that it is possible to define the processes you need to implement precisely. Visure can adapt to different organizations and answer several needs. It also works together with Jira or other defect tracking applications to synchronize and link all the requirements with the defects (I haven't used this feature so far but have seen it during a demo of the tool). Here are the different areas Visure can cover:- Requirement Management- Risk Management- Test Management- Procurement Management- Variants Management.

• Tracing of requirements.
• Tracking of development.
• Tracking of QA.
• Tracking of bugs.
• Tracking of releases.
• Wiki.
• Users and teams.
• Works for teams scattered across the globe.
• Testing and coverage for releases.
• Integration with SVN.

• Search.
• Metric calculation.
• Would be nice that cB is a source of truth, i.e., that say SVN commit is done only from cB; know this is difficult to achieve.

• We had specific problems related to our use cases (process configuration) which were solved with Visure's support team.

Sometimes info in codeBeamer can be lost, in principle, if not well organized by the user, info can never be found, or can be forgotten about, etc

Excellent support professionally. Also, thanks for giving me for free access to SaaS cB for my hobbyist project.

codeBeamer is by far better.

• Customer tracking.
• Process tracking.
• Workflow framework.
• Can be overhead.