TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Comodo Firewall vs. Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Comodo Firewall

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/AComodo Cybersecurity headquartered in New Jersey offers the Comodo Firewall to deliver security controls to moderate size businesses.

    $29.99

    per year per user

    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AMobile Security Framework (MobSF) is an automated, all-in-one mobile application (Android/iOS/Windows) pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. MobSF support mobile app binaries (APK, IPA & APPX) along with zipped source code and provides REST APIs for integration with CI/CD or DevSecOps pipeline. The Dynamic Analyzer helps you to perform runtime security assessment and interactive instrumented testing.N/A
    Pricing
    Comodo FirewallMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Comodo FirewallMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Comodo FirewallMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    Firewall
    Comparison of Firewall features of Comodo Firewall and Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    Feature
    Comodo Firewall
    7.0
    1 Ratings
    20% below category average
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    -
    Ratings
    Identification Technologies7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visualization Tools6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content Inspection7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Policy-based Controls10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Firewall Management Console6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting and Logging5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Proxy Server8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Comodo FirewallMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    Small Businesses
    SonicWall NSA Series
    Score8.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Metasploit
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software
    Score9 out of 10
    Metasploit
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Comodo FirewallMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Comodo FirewallMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Comodo
    In an enterprise, where there is a threshold of many new users with whom there is a need to share the internet, Comodo Firewall can really ease the burden. Security of network and infrastructure increases with less cost compared to other alternatives. Allows advanced users to create advanced scenarios and deal with them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    MobSF is good for checking for vulnerabilities in your app. It will also give suggestions on how to address them. Another thing is can do is find code that may be incorrect. It is not, however, a substitute for a system that actually checks your code for proper use. It really is concentrated on security.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Comodo
    • Beginner friendly UI
    • Extensibility for pro users
    • Very low on system resources
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Scan for vulnerabilities
    • Scan for bad coding
    • Give suggestions on fixes for security issues
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Comodo
    • Provide package for Linux systems as well.
    • Pricing is still not friendly for casual users.
    • Allow API integration with web application.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • The UI is not that user friendly
    • The documentation could be easier to understand
    • An easier method of deploying MobSF would be appreciated
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Comodo
    Although AWS WAF is really nice and convenient, it only runs on a web application level, no doubt it has no match in that particular segment, and it is prone to vendor locking. Comodo on the other hand provides better service on the system and network level. if you have to choose a better UI, Comodo is the best solution
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    In my opinion, MobSF is not as comprehensive as SonarQube. Both, however, do a very good job in scanning your code for vulnerabilities. Both do roughly the same things. The reports of SonarQube are more detailed though. The advantage that MobSF has over SonarQube is the price. One is free while the other is a paid solution (with several tiers). However, we use them together to get a more comprehensive scan.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Comodo
    • For enterprise level company, it has really great ROI.
    • Not perfect fit for individual use or for small company.
    • We streamlined the process of managing network security.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • It has allowed our apps to pass a security vetting requirement of a third party to deploy our app
    • We can see where we can improve on the development of our app
    • The deployment can take a while, especially with teams not familiar with the software
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots