TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) vs. OpenText Operations Orchestration

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ACoreOS rkt or Container Linux was a rival to Docker that was acquired by Red Hat, then given to the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF). The project has since been discontinued.N/A

    OpenText Operations Orchestration

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AOpenText™ Operations Orchestration automates, integrates, and orchestrates any IT process, on cloud or off. Automations use low-code/no-code workflow authoring options. Integrations are done with an API-rich, extensible platform. Centrally orchestrates workflows.N/A
    Pricing
    CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)OpenText Operations Orchestration
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)OpenText Operations Orchestration
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)OpenText Operations Orchestration
    Workload Automation
    Comparison of Workload Automation features of CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) and OpenText Operations Orchestration
    Feature
    CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText Operations Orchestration
    9.5
    2 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Multi-platform scheduling00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Central monitoring00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Logging00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Alerts and notifications00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Analysis and visualization00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Application integration00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)OpenText Operations Orchestration
    Small Businesses
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Apache Airflow
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Redwood RunMyJobs
    Score9.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)OpenText Operations Orchestration
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)OpenText Operations Orchestration
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    CoreOS rkt is well suited for any development environment where operating systems and hardware are not homogeneous. CoreOS rkt allows us to write code on one machine with the confidence that it will work on any other. This has been immensely helpful as our developers are often switching to the latest and greatest machines and operating systems. CoreOS rkt is less suited for environments that are not Software as a Service. There is often no need to bring the entire developer environment and associated dependencies when delivering a one time product. In these environments CoreOS rkt just adds unneeded overhead.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    The products are being paired by the company with different software to specifically fit multiple scenarios. As a standalone platform, it can answer any task with its build-in content or the ability to create your own content and solution.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • Running a secure container without messing up with low-level details
    • Very clear and straightforward approach to building a container
    • A way to go for new projects thinking of containers
    • Comprehensive and well-written documentation compatible with UNIX keep it simple way of thinking
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Allows for the quick disconnection of accounts that break our terms of service
    • Seamless integration with our billing system
    • Has the ability to house all member/client account information in one single location
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • Market share, it's often very difficult to find new talent who use CoreOS rkt.
    • Lack of wow features, CoreOS rkt doesn't necessarily offer any immediate advantages over other container solutions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • The product build in portal need to be more flexible
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    Docker, lxc, Ubuntu Snappy, partisan chroot+unshare Reformulating the problem and realizing a container is not necessary when a testing environment with clearly defined behavior.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Most product works well enough, but none of them combine the non-agent/client approach to automation with an easy to develop mechanism (the drag&drop development approach) This alone put this solution on top of our preferred implantation product list
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • Developers spend less time configuring and more time coding.
    • Less time training developers as CoreOS rkt lets them use whatever hardware and operating system they want.
    • Reduced our IT costs, solutions are containerized using CoreOS rkt meaning they can write one solution with many developers in mind.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • If time is money, the time saved by using this all-in-one product has certainly saved time AND money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots