CrowdStrike Falcon for Mobile vs. Symantec Endpoint Protection Mobile

Although
it is extremely rare, performance issues can arise when we protect data because
of the rising volume of traffic on our system. The constant version updates
annoy me a lot. It's difficult to upgrade the clients frequently if you have a
larger number of clients.

• Mobile malware protection
• content filtering
• Root/Jailbreak detection
• device secure configuration enforcement

• better reporting
• reduce false positive
• support can be better

Even programmers who build complex code do not experience any
negative effects from this lightweight agent, which cannot be readily destroyed
or removed so that devices are always being watched. Additionally, it offers
deception technologies that other suppliers frequently do not in comparable
solutions. It has the capacity to proactively quarantine potentially infected
devices.

• positive: all companies mobile device are secured and no need to reset device frequently
• positive: connect to a SIEM for suspicious events correlation
• positive: provide employees BYOD protection