CSI ETABS vs. SAPPHIRE Structure

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CSI ETABS
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
ETABS, from Computers and Structures, Inc headquartered in Walnut Creek, California, is an integrated software package for the structural analysis and design of buildings that offers a single user interface to perform modeling, analysis, design, and reporting. There is no limit to the number of model windows, model manipulation views, and data views.N/A
SAPPHIRE Structure
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
MiTek offers SAPPHIRE Structure, a structural modeling, editing, and estimation tool for builders.N/A
Pricing
CSI ETABSSAPPHIRE Structure
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CSI ETABSSAPPHIRE Structure
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CSI ETABSSAPPHIRE Structure
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
CSI ETABSSAPPHIRE Structure
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
CSI ETABS
-
Ratings
SAPPHIRE Structure
8.5
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Dashboards00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Data exportability00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
CSI ETABS
-
Ratings
SAPPHIRE Structure
9.6
1 Ratings
25% above category average
Plan distribution & viewing00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
As-built drawings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Mobile app00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Specifications00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
CSI ETABS
-
Ratings
SAPPHIRE Structure
9.5
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Takeoff tools00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Job costing00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Cost databases00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Cost calculator00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CSI ETABSSAPPHIRE Structure
Small Businesses
AutoCAD
AutoCAD
Score 8.8 out of 10
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
AutoCAD
AutoCAD
Score 8.8 out of 10
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
AutoCAD
AutoCAD
Score 8.8 out of 10
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CSI ETABSSAPPHIRE Structure
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
CSI ETABSSAPPHIRE Structure
Likelihood to Recommend
Computers and Structures, Inc
For High Rise Buildings I would prefer E-tabs only, as the other scope are projct situated in earthquake peone zone will be easy to design a and analysis the sesmic waves with recent input data. Also for steel structures, as E-tabs provide most details in RCC.
Read full review
MiTek Industries
In our organisation, we are 10 designers working with sapphire. We are able to design multiple units of building without any problems. The learning curve is not small but when you start to master the software, it is incredible. The precision of this software is amazing. If needed, you can easily share your file with a coworker if you need helps...
Read full review
Pros
Computers and Structures, Inc
  • Loads distributation as it is our main concern
  • Providing rebar quantity as well as providing a full 3d model object of rebar's
  • Providing quanttity sheets and material specification in final output
Read full review
MiTek Industries
  • Automatically generating different elements to save time.
  • Designing and calculating elements.
  • Providing a clear material listing.
Read full review
Cons
Computers and Structures, Inc
  • First E-tabs need to work on ease of load chnaging on an particular object after analysis as it reduce time and confusion between elements
  • The rebaring model on final output should be have more editing options as it will help in understanding and easy to use
  • Need to work on stairs rebar as it is also one of more important
Read full review
MiTek Industries
  • Not friendly user
  • Maybe providing to many options to do one thing.
  • Big Learning curve if you want to to big buildings.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Computers and Structures, Inc
The only reason where I would hose the E-tabs is its commands which are easy to use and it also probide rebar shedule for whole project and also provide the model of rebar which gives me clear idea and helps from manual calculations.
Read full review
MiTek Industries
SAPPHIRE is way more complete and precise than EzCad. You can't just draw a bunch of lines and make it works( even if in reality it doesn't work). Your work needs to make sense in order to design it. If you make mistakes the software will tell you and you will need to correct your mistakes.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Computers and Structures, Inc
  • Well as we alnalysis structure its has positivite effect for continuing the project further.
  • Expected Data @ times leads to disappointment as we need more details to save time
  • Working on E-TAb s in a customize organisation helps to provide result
Read full review
MiTek Industries
  • Faster turn around time
  • More precise than ever
  • Great data exportation
Read full review
ScreenShots