TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cyberark Secrets Manager vs. Mirantis Kubernetes Engine

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cyberark Secrets Manager

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ACyberark Secrets Manager (formerly Conjur) is used to securely authenticate, control and audit non-human access across tools, applications, containers and cloud environments via a secrets management software solution.N/A

    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AThe Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise, acquired by Mirantis in November 2019)aims to let users ship code faster. Mirantis Kubernetes Engine gives users one set of APIs and tools to deploy, manage, and observe secure-by-default, certified, batteries-included Kubernetes clusters on any infrastructure: public cloud, private cloud, or bare metal.

    $500

    per year per node

    Pricing
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerMirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Free
    $0.00
    per year
    Basic
    $500.00
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerMirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsThese pricing options are compatible with Linux or Windows Server and are per year, per node. The basic version requires maximum online purchase not to exceed 50 nodes. Support/professional services are not included.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerMirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Considered Both Products
    Cyberark
    No answer on this topic
    Mirantis
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    83%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    80%
    Delivers good value for the price
    4 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerMirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Small Businesses
    GitLab
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Google Cloud Run
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    GitLab
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    GitLab
    Score8.9 out of 10
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerMirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.9
    (2 ratings)
    8.3
    (37 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.8
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerMirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cyberark
    Cyberark Conjur is well-suited and includes the following: > Securing access to sensitive data in multi-cloud environments. > Providing secure access to secrets and credentials for 3rd party services and applications
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Mirantis
    [Mirantis Cloud Native Suite (Docker Enterprise)] is the most advanced tool till now, which works as a VMs
    and separates any single application from the dependencies. Also, this tool is
    helping me in the agile development of the processes. It is strongly recommended to
    almost all major organizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cyberark
    • Provide allow-list
    • verifying authority
    • validate access
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Mirantis
    • Containers - Docker is the go-to when using Containers, which are super useful if you need an environment that works both for Windows and Linux
    • Efficiency - Docker is very lightweight and doesn't demand too much from your CPU or server
    • CI/CD - Docker is excellent for plumbing into your build pipeline. It integrates nicely, is reliable, and has an easy set up.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cyberark
    • Searching containers can be difficult if you're not sure which you're looking for.
    • Initial authorization can be slow, specifically if the first instance failed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Mirantis
    • Containers are often opaque - if a container doesn't work out of the box, it's messy to fix.
    • Logging is complexified by the multiple containers and logs are often not piped to places you expect them to be.
    • Networking is complexified due to internal port mapping between containers, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Cyberark
    No answers on this topic
    Mirantis
    Docker's CLI has a lot of options, and they aren't all intuitive. And there are so many tools in the space (Docker Compose, Docker Swarm, etc) that have their own configuration as well. So while there is a lot to learn, most concepts transfer easily and can be learned once and applied across everything.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Cyberark
    No answers on this topic
    Mirantis
    The community support for Docker is fantastic. There is almost always an answer for any issue I might encounter day-to-day, either on Stack Overflow, a helpful blog post, or the community Slack workspace. I've never come across a problem that I was unable to solve via some searching around in the community.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cyberark
    Cyberark Conjur has been a great asset to our company as it is a one stop shop that holds individuals, teams, departments, and the entire company accountable for the safety network. Not only do you have to be authorized to access Cyberark Conjuryou have to reauthorize to open, copy, or see individual passwords or accounts leaving a cyber trace of all your actions. There's no way to accidently get into something you're not supposed to be in.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Mirantis
    We've used XAMPP, PHPmyAdmin and similar local environments (our app is on PHP). Because of how easy you can change the configuration of libraries on PHP and versions (which is SO painful on XAMPP or other friendly LAMP local servers) we are using Docker right now. Also, being sure that the environment is exactly the same makes things easier for developing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cyberark
    • Before Cyberark we put passwords in a spread sheet - leaving exposure to theft.
    • Gives security compliance to our company
    • Keeps company and teams secure and safe.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Mirantis
    • Docker has made it possible for us to deploy code faster, increasing the productivity of our development teams.
    • Docker has made it possible for us to decentralize our build and release system. This means that teams can deploy on their own schedule and our dev ops team can concentrate on building better tools rather than deploying for the teams
    • Docker has allowed us to virtualize our entire development process and made it much simpler to build out new data centers. This, in turn, is significantly increasing our ROI by providing a path forward for internationalization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Cyberark Secrets Manager Screenshots

    Screenshot of CyberArk Conjur UIScreenshot of CyberArk Conjur UIScreenshot of CyberArk Conjur UI