TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cyberoam vs. SonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cyberoam

    Score6 out of 10
    N/ASophos’s Cyberoam offers UTM and NGFW products. Cyberoam provides the full suite of modularized firewall services, as well as real-time reporting, for enterprise-level use.N/A

    SonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AThe SonicWall Web Content Client (CFC) compares requested sites against its database of web sites to provide configurable content filtering.N/A
    Pricing
    CyberoamSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CyberoamSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    CyberoamSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
    Firewall
    Comparison of Firewall features of Cyberoam and SonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
    Feature
    Cyberoam
    8.7
    2 Ratings
    1% above category average
    SonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
    -
    Ratings
    Identification Technologies8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visualization Tools8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content Inspection7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Policy-based Controls9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Active Directory and LDAP8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Firewall Management Console8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting and Logging9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    VPN8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    High Availability9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Stateful Inspection9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Proxy Server9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CyberoamSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
    Small Businesses
    SonicWall NSA Series
    Score8.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
    Score9.6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CyberoamSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CyberoamSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cyberoam
    Our organization found that Cyberoam is a cost-effective solution compared to other vendors. Cyberoam was having issues with SSO for Web Filtering. For, web filtering and application blocking, Cyberoam does not contain enough signatures or data so we can not achieve the goal of all of the sites that need to be blocked. Cyberoam is great because of its ease of use feature.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonicWall
    When the user is connecting to the internet and should not access some social media website or malware sites or unauthorized websites which may distract users and affect the productivity so to avoid any problems. It is a very simple setup. It is very easy to deploy, configure, and implement.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cyberoam
    • Accurate and precise bandwidth shaping
    • Utm features are completely reliable,uses mainly for conducting exams smoothly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonicWall
    • In built customized policies
    • Control access to unsecure web content
    • Application traffic analytics
    • IP-based HTTPS content filtering
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cyberoam
    • Without mentioning an alternative brand, there is another leading company who has updated with firewall UI quite a bit. They offer an expanded line-up to meet a wider array of needs including specific appliances for web caching, proxy servers, and other products that have the same and familiar UI across the products. Each of the products does have some overlap so that customers can choose the right appliance for their use case.
    • After being acquired by Sophos, we saw our year-over-year costs escalate significantly since our original maintenance contract. They should consider revisiting the pricing, especially for education.
    • They should consider a current market analysis and see how the market is changing and adapting with other lower cost appliances for their product line up.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonicWall
    • Malware scanning
    • Content Filtering Client for roaming devices
    • Cost
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cyberoam
    The main factor is cost, as we are a startup organization. That's the main reason we choose Cyberoam stacks up against other network security services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonicWall
    Easy to setup and more stable solution. User friendly interface. Scalable and also in terms of cost it seems to be affordable solution with the best in-class protection benefits and other on demand features like dynamically updated
    rating architecture and high-performance web caching and
    rating architecture
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cyberoam
    • Considerable change was noted in the utilization of administrators after switching from the software firewall.
    • It is relatively better priced when compared to fortigate.
    • Better log handling after the switch.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonicWall
    • Improves Productivity
    • Ensures safe environment by allowing genuine traffic
    • Continued productivity helps to regain ROI in more figures
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots