Cymulate vs. Mandiant Advantage (discontinued)

Many companies that have an presence can benefit from using Mandiant ASM to identify and manage their internet facing assets, like web servers, email servers and DNS servers. This helps reduce the risk of cyberattacks targeting these assets.However smaller organizations with exposure might not always need the extensive attack surface monitoring provided by Mandiant ASM. For example a small company with one website may not require much monitoring, as a larger corporation.

Incentivized

• The product's simulated attack tests helped identify security gaps in company networks.
• Helped finding drifts in security controls and IT environment.
• Provided actual data to support decision making.

Incentivized

• Manpower Cost
• More emphasis on automated testing comparison to manual testing
• Need more emphasis on simulation of real world attacks

Incentivized

Being able to get a lot of detailed information about different attacks and different tactics for specific attack types and threat actors is very helpful. Mandiant Support was a bit of a struggle - they need to increase support staffing and capabilities without having to wait for escalations. Overall a good tool, but could be better.

Incentivized

There are many parameters which are the differentiator between mandiant and Cymulate but some of the key differentitors are listed below: 1) Manpower costs are less and justified as compared to Cymulate 2) Better technologies innovation 3) Good reputation in market 4) Good cummulative man hour experience Also, they are in the market from last 20 years and they have a huge client base.

Incentivized

• High ROI
• Great visibility
• Resource Intensive

Incentivized