Dell PowerScale vs. IBM Storage Scale

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Dell PowerScale
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Dell Technologies presents Dell PowerScale (replacing EMC Isilon) as a scale-out NAS solution and server technology that provides the flexibility of a software-defined architecture with accelerated hardware innovations to harness the value of data. Isilon Systems was acquired by EMC in 2010; some EMC Isilon NAS appliances are still available and supported under the PowerScale brand.N/A
IBM Storage Scale
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
IBM Storage Scale (formerly IBM Spectrum Scale) supports storage management of unstructured data for big data analytics.N/A
Pricing
Dell PowerScaleIBM Storage Scale
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Dell PowerScaleIBM Storage Scale
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Dell PowerScaleIBM Storage Scale
Considered Both Products
Dell PowerScale
Chose Dell PowerScale
Dell EMC PowerMax NVMe, NetApp AFF A-Series All Flash Arrays and XtremIO Flash Storage
Chose Dell PowerScale
Isilon is immensely more scalable than Celerra and gave us better control over snapshots and replication. The addition of global deduplication provides a huge space savings benefit as well.
Chose Dell PowerScale
Raw disk space vs. logical disk space ratio was significantly better on the Isilon. Fast cache using SSD drives for faster searching is available on the Isilon but not available on the Overland solution. Isilon solution included faster backend switching between nodes.
IBM Storage Scale
Chose IBM Storage Scale
Through the use IBM Spectrum Scale tools its quite easy and secure environment that are provided to manipulate business data smoothly and manage multiple data storage platforms. IBM Spectrum Scale also allows effective data access and data transportation channels for big files …
Chose IBM Storage Scale
When we implemented the Spectrum Scale solution, we had in place a NetApp FAS series working in Metro Cluster mode. What is great about NetApp is its low maintenance. On the other hand, it lacks performance, especially on the CPU nodes. We needed a solution that will deliver …
Chose IBM Storage Scale
We chose this solution thanks to our experience with GPFS, and we have confirmed the functionalities of the product.
Chose IBM Storage Scale
It was the solution that fit the requirements of our customers.
Chose IBM Storage Scale
Spectrum Scale is a unique product in that it allows for both storage management and orchestration.
Best Alternatives
Dell PowerScaleIBM Storage Scale
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

StarWind Virtual SAN
StarWind Virtual SAN
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Everpure FlashBlade
Everpure FlashBlade
Score 9.9 out of 10
StarWind Virtual SAN
StarWind Virtual SAN
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Everpure FlashBlade
Everpure FlashBlade
Score 9.9 out of 10
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Dell PowerScaleIBM Storage Scale
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Dell PowerScaleIBM Storage Scale
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited for scale out NAS storage. One can use Rest API calls to get relevant data. It can be used in the product SRM, where one can discover arrays from Isilon/PowerScale and can monitor the reports. One can monitor Capacity and Performance reports of the array.
Read full review
IBM Spectrum Scale creates excellent and real time data results and the capability to extract data and data modeling tools via IBM Spectrum Scale is amazing. The capacity planning and data archiving and the data security offered by IBM Spectrum Scale is more productive and the data quality control using the system is impressive.
Read full review
Pros
  • Auto data balancing between nodes while still maintaining great performance
  • Directory snapshots
  • Universal namespace
  • Network load balancing across nodes
Read full review
  • Good for storage Optimizing.
  • Good velocity.
  • Strong agility in the product.
Read full review
Cons
  • In my experience, I have seen a lot of bugs in the oneFS and for remedying it, we need to install patches which requires a node reboot.
  • In old isilon OneFS versions, the nodes need to be rebooted every 250 days which is quite less compared to other storage devices.
  • The operational cost of Isilon is a bit on the higher side.
Read full review
  • Price
  • Requires a learning curve and training to manage the product
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Isilon is immensely more scalable than Celerra and gave us better control over snapshots and replication. The addition of global deduplication provides a huge space savings benefit as well.
Read full review
When we implemented the Spectrum Scale solution, we had in place a NetApp FAS series working in Metro Cluster mode. What is great about NetApp is its low maintenance. On the other hand, it lacks performance, especially on the CPU nodes. We needed a solution that will deliver steady performance while keeping a steady growth.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We are currently researching other vendors for our Medical imaging archives due to issues with space utilization efficiency on Isilon.
Read full review
  • Different versions in a short period of time
  • Re-creation of the certificates after an update creates confusion
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Storage Scale Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of