D&B Risk Analytics vs. Dow Jones Risk & Compliance

Great for vendor risk management and running financial health reports on our supplier base. In addition, our transactional banking team uses the platform (more specifically the Paydex score) to assess obligors and clients for financial health. I think the ESG component of the platform still needs more work. I don't think there's enough data in the industry to really make good predictive scores.

It is particularly well-suited for financial institutions and other organizations in heavily regulated industries, such as banks and money service businesses that need to comply with anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) regulations, as well as organizations with a high volume of transactions. The product offers features such as watchlist screening, real-time monitoring, intelligence and research, automated workflows, reporting and visualization and easy integration with other systems. However, it may not be the best fit for smaller organizations with a lower risk profile or limited budget, or organizations with relatively simple compliance requirements

Incentivized

• Robust insight on financial health.
• Continuous monitoring & alerts.
• Predictive measurers that are quantifiable.

• Finding the correct entity in D&B. There are usually tons of D&B #s for one entity.
• ESG ratings still need work.
• We are still determining internally what the best practice is for these financial health ratings. What does it mean for us?

D&B Risk Analytics contains all information I need to do my job well and has a daily updated scores to reflect the financial situation.

I only used D&B Risk Analytics.

• We have had the solution for less than a year, so it is tough to say how much positive/negative impact it has had.
• We are now able to continuously monitor some entities in our supplier base. We were not able to do this before.