D&B Risk Analytics vs. RiskImmune™

Great for vendor risk management and running financial health reports on our supplier base. In addition, our transactional banking team uses the platform (more specifically the Paydex score) to assess obligors and clients for financial health. I think the ESG component of the platform still needs more work. I don't think there's enough data in the industry to really make good predictive scores.

Responsible Cyber has been an essential tool for
our third-party risk management program. The platform's ability to support
multiple languages has made it easy for our team to use and collaborate
effectively

• Robust insight on financial health.
• Continuous monitoring & alerts.
• Predictive measurers that are quantifiable.

• I appreciate the multilingual capabilities of Responsible Cyber
• Responsible Cyber IMMUNE X-TPRM is an excellent TPRM tool that has helped us streamline our third-party risk management process
• The platform's multilingual capabilities have made it accessible to our team members who speak different languages

• Finding the correct entity in D&B. There are usually tons of D&B #s for one entity.
• ESG ratings still need work.
• We are still determining internally what the best practice is for these financial health ratings. What does it mean for us?

• I have been using Immune IMMUNE X-TPRM for several months now and have found super helpful

D&B Risk Analytics contains all information I need to do my job well and has a daily updated scores to reflect the financial situation.

I only used D&B Risk Analytics.

I have been using Immune IMMUNE X-TPRM for several
months now and have found super helpful

• We have had the solution for less than a year, so it is tough to say how much positive/negative impact it has had.
• We are now able to continuously monitor some entities in our supplier base. We were not able to do this before.