Dow Jones Risk & Compliance vs. Parrot Analytics

It is particularly well-suited for financial institutions and other organizations in heavily regulated industries, such as banks and money service businesses that need to comply with anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) regulations, as well as organizations with a high volume of transactions. The product offers features such as watchlist screening, real-time monitoring, intelligence and research, automated workflows, reporting and visualization and easy integration with other systems. However, it may not be the best fit for smaller organizations with a lower risk profile or limited budget, or organizations with relatively simple compliance requirements

Incentivized

It is well suited for products where there are a lot of users at scale performing and interacting with the platform. Also where businesses need to take informed decisions based on mass users performing actions at scale. Therefore demand analytics tools like Parrot can be a real boon for such businesses. It is less appropriate for those who are not having users at that scale. Scale is very important I believe and analytics can be even more powerful once we have a lot of data on our hands.

Incentivized

• In-depth Demand Analytics of core features.
• Proper recommendations of features.
• Popularity tracking of the core data that we have and mapping with users.

Incentivized

• Audience behaviour dataset can be improved.
• Demand tracking for features can have more metrics to get even more granular.

Incentivized

• We were able to capture data metrics by almost 25% more as compared to another analytics tool we previously used.
• Recommendations of new data grew by at least 15%.

Incentivized