Exotel vs. Reach Interactive SMS

Exotel is well suited for: - Small and mid-sized Internet based businesses where it is necessary for them to have a very strong customer support team working round the clock and in different shifts. - Company making large number of calls and sending mass SMS's. They can do that on a single cloud based platform. Exotel might not be a good fit if: -it is not a call intensive business that you want to cater to. Though the setup cost is very low but it follows economies of scale i.e. more the number of calls, less will be per call cost.

Incentivized

• Outbound calling for Sales/Support
• Call routing to Agent Mobiles
• Inbuild Inbound flow designer

Incentivized

• Communication
• Not for large companies
• Volume of texts

Incentivized

As a company our goals have slightly surpassed the current Exotel features and would want some other software which has better capabilities

Incentivized

For cold calling and outbound callings, to a certain extend Exotel serves the purpose as mutliple DID numbers are available at our fingertips. For company which use outcalling as a form of passing information to users can benefit from the flexibility it provides. They have a recharge and use model which doesnt have certain expiry. Basic API documentation available and lesser support from their support team on this matter makes it difficult to check if the API thows any error

Incentivized

Initially they had chat support which was available faster. But now the chat support gets routed to a virtual agent and unable to get in touch with an actual agent. They also have no support with respect to the API's and other integrations.

Incentivized

It was pretty straight forward

Incentivized

Exotel was selected by us because of the following reasons: -Low set-up and maintenance cost as compared to its peers. -Prompt customer service: You want to upgrade your plan or facing any issues around the platform, Exotel team is just a call away. -Call recording Quality was also better than the peers.

Incentivized

• This increased onboarding efficiency to save money on startup.
• This saved us money by getting both services from one company.
• Con was price was higher than we would have liked but efficiency made up for that.

Incentivized