Fedora Linux vs. openSUSE Leap

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Fedora Linux
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Fedora Linux is a Linux distribution supported by the Fedora Project. Fedora is available in a number of different editions, including: Fedora CoreOS, an automatically-updating, minimal operating system for running containerized workloads securely and at scale. Fedora Workstation for laptop and desktop computers, with a complete set of tools for developers. Fedora Server for data centers. Fedora IoT for IoT ecosystems. Fedora…N/A
openSUSE Leap
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
German company SUSE supports the Linux distribution, openSUSE. Leap is the stable and regular release option for installing openSUSE. New and experienced Linux users get the most usable Linux distribution and stabilized operating system with openSUSE’s regular release. Receive updates and harden the OS with openSUSE’s latest major distribution. Presented as the platform of choice for Linux developers, administrators and software vendors.N/A
Pricing
Fedora LinuxopenSUSE Leap
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fedora LinuxopenSUSE Leap
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Fedora LinuxopenSUSE Leap
Features
Fedora LinuxopenSUSE Leap
Operating System
Comparison of Operating System features of Product A and Product B
Fedora Linux
9.8
1 Ratings
11% above category average
openSUSE Leap
-
Ratings
File Management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Software Application Management9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
System Update Frequency10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Operating System Security10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Fedora LinuxopenSUSE Leap
Small Businesses
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Score 8.2 out of 10
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Fedora LinuxopenSUSE Leap
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(3 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Fedora LinuxopenSUSE Leap
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
For experimental use, test lab situations, or very special-purpose tasks, Fedora [Linux] is an excellent choice. We are almost exclusively a CentOS shop for our production stuff, but in labs, we take more risks with things like Ubuntu or Fedora. It's not as appropriate as CentOS for production level endeavors, but it lets us know "this is where we could be going" when we engage in r&d tasks.
Read full review
SUSE
OpenSUSE Leap is well suited for just about any Linux task. Especially I like to use it as Docker base image for my software deployments, because it has a wide variety of software packages available already precompiled and packages are well maintained - vulnerable software versions are patched in reasonable time. OpenSUSE Leap is rpm based system, and it wouldn't install Debian or other systems packages. If your software is not an rpm package then OpenSUSE Leap would not be suitable for your system.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • frequent updates
  • DNF as the package manager
  • strong focus on security
Read full review
SUSE
  • Maintenance of software packages using YAST
  • Availability of patches when a vulnerability is discovered
  • Distribution upgrades
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • Stability. It's good, but it's not anything like CentOS for stability
  • End-user usability. It has a few glaring holes here and there with UI/UX
Read full review
SUSE
  • Commercial packages not always available
  • Stable packages sometimes lag behind the latest releases
Read full review
Usability
Open Source
The desktop environments are all well configured out of the box. The software selection is useful, but not bloated. With flatpak integration, getting the latest software is easy. If there is anything that I can't immediately figure out, the documentation is thorough and well written, and the community is always happy to step in and assist.
Read full review
SUSE
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
I prefer Fedora over Debian because Fedora tends to be more up to date. When compared to Ubuntu, Fedora is nice as it doesn't use snap, and remains open. When I tried Kubuntu, I found the distro to be a bit too unstable for my liking.
Read full review
SUSE
openSUSE Leap has wide variety of already precompiled software packages in default repositories. It even has some specific packages in official repositories that are not available in other Linux distribution repositories. It is also very stable and reliable distro - we can predict when new versions will be released and when we should make system upgrades.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Shorter LTS means more administrator work
  • Security patches help reduce vulnerabilities to help save money
Read full review
SUSE
  • More effective maintenance means a smaller headcount needed for running the production servers.
  • The easiness of deployment means more time we can spend on software development of company-specific applications.
  • Great community support and overlap with other Linux systems mean that an answer to nearly any problem is usually one google query away.
Read full review
ScreenShots