Fedora Linux vs. Oracle Solaris

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Fedora Linux
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Fedora Linux is a Linux distribution supported by the Fedora Project. Fedora is available in a number of different editions, including: Fedora CoreOS, an automatically-updating, minimal operating system for running containerized workloads securely and at scale. Fedora Workstation for laptop and desktop computers, with a complete set of tools for developers. Fedora Server for data centers. Fedora IoT for IoT ecosystems. Fedora…N/A
Oracle Solaris
Score 6.5 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Solaris is a Linux operating system which was originally developed by Sun Microsystems and became an Oracle product after the acquisition of Sun in 2010.
$1,000
per year
Pricing
Fedora LinuxOracle Solaris
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
1 Year Subscription
$1,000.00
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fedora LinuxOracle Solaris
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Fedora LinuxOracle Solaris
Features
Fedora LinuxOracle Solaris
Operating System
Comparison of Operating System features of Product A and Product B
Fedora Linux
-
Ratings
Oracle Solaris
9.0
1 Ratings
5% above category average
File Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Software Application Management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
System Update Frequency00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Operating System Security00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Fedora LinuxOracle Solaris
Small Businesses
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Score 8.5 out of 10
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Fedora LinuxOracle Solaris
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(2 ratings)
8.0
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Fedora LinuxOracle Solaris
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
For experimental use, test lab situations, or very special-purpose tasks, Fedora [Linux] is an excellent choice. We are almost exclusively a CentOS shop for our production stuff, but in labs, we take more risks with things like Ubuntu or Fedora. It's not as appropriate as CentOS for production level endeavors, but it lets us know "this is where we could be going" when we engage in r&d tasks.
Read full review
Oracle
It's good for environments that need to operate 24/7 due to its stability, as I mentioned before. It's also very good for enterprise applications that can't afford unscheduled downtime, for truly high-priority environments. I don't think it would be recommended for small companies with people who have no prior knowledge of the tool, as the learning curve is quite steep.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • frequent updates
  • DNF as the package manager
  • strong focus on security
Read full review
Oracle
  • Preferred Operating System to run Oracle Databases
  • Performs well with Java and Oracle applications
  • Great for Virtualizations.
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • Stability. It's good, but it's not anything like CentOS for stability
  • End-user usability. It has a few glaring holes here and there with UI/UX
Read full review
Oracle
  • It seems that Solaris is becoming an afterthought at Oracle.
  • Oracle should be more vocal in their commitment to Solaris
  • Support Costs
Read full review
Usability
Open Source
This is a personal preference based on working with hundreds of client projects, I prefer Ubuntu over Fedora Linux.
Read full review
Oracle
You need to take the time to learn it. It is a massive product.
Read full review
Support Rating
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The support teams are well trained and responsive. Patches are rolled out regularly and are easy to deploy and backout.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Stress testing and timing is key. You need test systems that mirror the live environments. User testing must be reflected in peak loads.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
We are an all-CentOS-shop, but we've done a number of things with Ubuntu and Fedora. Most of the production CentOS machines are only there because prior to that Fedora helped to blaze the trail to get there. It's been a very good platform for testing our new ideas. Ubuntu is similarly positioned in our organization, but Fedora stacks up well in our environment.
Read full review
Oracle
We used Windows Server quite a bit because of the ease of use for the team, file sharing, Active Directory, and systems integrated with Windows; learning was easier, and the interface was more user-friendly. On the other hand, Oracle stood out for its stability because we provide services that keep environments up and running 24/7.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Shorter LTS means more administrator work
  • Security patches help reduce vulnerabilities to help save money
Read full review
Oracle
  • Possibility to migrate old servers protecting previous inversions
  • reduces implementation times and accelerates time to obtain value in the market.
Read full review
ScreenShots