FICO Blaze Advisor vs. Higson

FICO Blaze Advisor is suitable for cases where you have to deal with rules and where you want to customise the rules based on the business need then this product is very good to use. Also it provide easy deployment so, wherever there is frequent changes in deployment then this tool is good to use since it provides the direct deployment.

Incentivized

Hyperon is less appropriate in smaller projects that do not contain a lot of business logic. However, if there are a lot of business rules to manage, many things that might be frequently changed, then Hyperon is a good tool to address it.

• Large customisation
• Create custom data item like variables
• Nice GUI, and user friendly

Incentivized

• Separation of business logic from the app's code
• Decision table performance
• Good GUI

• Slow response
• Slow Notifications
• Less documentation and support

Incentivized

• Pretty high entry threshold
• A few bugs in GUI
• UX might be better in some places

It's a very good tool to manage business rules. There are certain GUI bugs and a code boilerplate, but overall it does its job really well.

There is documentation on the site to help learn about the tool. There is also an email to ask for help or any other questions. The team responds quickly with a full answer.

Overall using FICO Blaze Advisor is good experience since change in any existing things were very easy in FICO Blaze Advisor, and I was easily able to make the change and deploy the things directly so that was real quick to check the things in the production, and this is the best point about FICO Blaze Advisor.

Incentivized

Hyperon has got far better performance. It also has far better GUI to manage business rules. On the other hand, Drools has a bigger community to help you with your problems.

• Overall positive impact
• Increase the efficiency
• Increase the productivity and quality

Incentivized

• Shorter time to market with new features
• Business users might change things without the help of developers