Fin vs. PushEngage

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Fin
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Fin is an AI Agent for customer service. It automates complex queries, improves resolution times, and delivers consistently high-quality support at scale.
$0.99
one-time fee per outcome
PushEngage
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
PushEngage offers a proactive push notification service, supporting abandoned cart triggering, dynamic segmentation, automatic responders, and advanced analytics, as well as other features.
$0
2,500 subscribers
Pricing
FinPushEngage
Editions & Modules
Fin with your current helpdesk
$0.99
one-time fee per outcome
Copilot add-on
$35
per month per user
Pro add-on
$99
per month For analysis of 1,000 conversations
Fin with Intercom’s Helpdesk
from $39 + $0.99 per Fin outcome
per month per seat
Forever Free Plan
$0.00
2,500 subscribers
Business Plan
$29.00/Month
Up To 5,000 Subscribers
Premium Plan
$59.00/Month
Up To 10,000 Subscribers
Enterprise Plan
Contact Us for Quote
Up To Unlimited Subscribers
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FinPushEngage
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional DetailsFin comes with a 90-day money-back guarantee. Here's how it works: Intercom states that users who sign up for the Fin Guarantee Success Program and do not achieve at least a resolution rate of 65% will be paid $1M. This program is designed for high volume customers. Eligibility criteria: High volume customers (over 250k monthly conversions) in North America and Europe. Intercom states that phase one of this program will admit customers on Intercom Helpdesk or Zendesk.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FinPushEngage
Best Alternatives
FinPushEngage
Small Businesses
LocaliQ
LocaliQ
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneSignal
OneSignal
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Piper the AI SDR by Qualified
Piper the AI SDR by Qualified
Score 9.0 out of 10
Iterable
Iterable
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Conversica
Conversica
Score 4.0 out of 10
Iterable
Iterable
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FinPushEngage
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(383 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(21 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(294 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.7
(10 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
7.4
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.6
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FinPushEngage
Likelihood to Recommend
Intercom
Fin is fantastic at answering simpler inquiries, where the range and types of questions are easier to categorize. Thereby reducing the subset of possible answers. Where it has shown great improvement - but still needs more improvement - is by becoming a true Agentic AI support engineer that is capable of answering more technically nuanced questions. Our product has a lot of variables used for troubleshooting that cannot be adequately captured in documentation. Even though we provide thousands of pages of spec docs, each issue is unique. Training and empowering Fin to be as good as a Level 1 support engineer is still very challenging.
Read full review
PushEngage
It is appropriate to send notifications through rss. It is less appropriate to send urgent notifications, it takes a long time to get the notification to users.
Read full review
Pros
Intercom
  • It is very easy to train
  • It does a great job of recommending answers when little context is given.
  • I love the ability to create a snippet to address issues in the moment or in the long term, based on FAQs.
Read full review
PushEngage
  • Supports sending to many users.
  • Allows the sending of different notifications to two different segments.
  • Allows user segmentation.
Read full review
Cons
Intercom
  • It seems some users really struggle to figure out how to escalate to a human (especially through email).
  • Not excited about how "soft" resolutions still count as resolutions and are paid for. Though some abandoned cases appear to be able to be concluded as "the user got the answer they needed", there are others where they clearly didn't, because they just open up another chat (or even more), trying to get more info. This pads the resolution stats and makes it seem more effective than it actually is.
  • Cost -- Fin is quite expensive. It helps us with scaling coverage, but we're not really saving money.
Read full review
PushEngage
  • Notifications take a long time to reach users.
  • The platform interface could improve.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Intercom
We have been and will be continuing our journey with Intercom and nothing too concerning has happened that I have experienced or heard of that has us on the edge yet. If it ever happens it will be something along the lines of "Outgrowing" the use of need of the platform.
Read full review
PushEngage
No answers on this topic
Usability
Intercom
The platform is overall clear and intuitive. As with any new platform, there's a learning curve, but that wasn't an issue for our team (and it shouldn't be an issue for others). Fin options are scattered across several submenus, and I'd like them grouped together, but I also like having all those training-related tabs open at all times, so it's not much of a real issue for me.
Read full review
PushEngage
The platform and analytics are slightly confusing.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Intercom
always there
Read full review
PushEngage
No answers on this topic
Performance
Intercom
works perfect
Read full review
PushEngage
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Intercom
I can get help by asking Fin questions about itself. It answers accurately, citing its own Help Center resources with visuals. It can reason and dialogue well. But when it comes to getting human support for Fin, it is not as quick. It can sometimes take a few days. They are polite and well-meaning. Some things aren't their fault (product limitations), but there was one occasion where something took a long time to resolve with lots of back and forth but it was I who found out the error in the end that they missed, so they didn't really help resolve it.
Read full review
PushEngage
The support was efficient and fast to resolve doubts.
Read full review
Online Training
Intercom
Easy to know the learning path
Read full review
PushEngage
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Intercom
The implementation was surprisingly easy but we are having to adapt from our old process to work well with Intercom.
Read full review
PushEngage
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Intercom
There are so many AI platforms available, and you could theoretically build a system using the available AI API's from any of the big platforms. However, I dont think it's as easy as this. Intercom is deliberately built for customer service, the features they are releasing a based on providing the best customer experience. If we were to build this ourselves or to use another platform we would be taking on the upkeep, using Fin is just much simpler as it's also our chosen ticketing platform so anything that Fin is not able to answer yet and escalated directly to our team with no extra effort required from our side.
Read full review
PushEngage
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Intercom
  • New role opportunities — Using the “Fin-first” approach has reduced the workload for our Tier 1 team, giving them more time to focus on their own career growth. It’s also opened the door to a dedicated, AI-focused role, where a team member regularly reviews Fin’s answers and makes updates to help it perform even better.
  • Enabling Fin has also reduced our response time and allowed us to meet SLA's.
Read full review
PushEngage
  • Due to the time it takes for notifications to arrive, the opportunity is lost in some publications we do.
  • With the notifications we have been able to reach more users.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Fin Screenshots

Screenshot of the Fin Flywheel, a continuous improvement loop that enables Fin to handle even the most complex queries.Screenshot of Insights, Monitors New , and Recommendations that help to understand, measure, and improve the customer experience with confidence.Screenshot of the interface to customize Fin's tone of voice, teach it support knowledge and policies, and configure how it handles complex tasks in over 45 languages.Screenshot of Data Connectors that enable Fin to securely retrieve data and take action in external systems like Shopify, Stripe, and Salesforce.

PushEngage Screenshots

Screenshot of Dynamic Segmentation: Sending notifications based on customer action is now possible using PushEngage. Create a drip campaign/series of notifications to increase your conversions, leads or click metrics.Screenshot of A/B Testing: Stop wondering on what would make your subscribers happy. Send different notifications to the same target group and analyze, which notification performs better. Use the Right Combination by experimenting with different text for title, message. Use different timings and find out what suits your subscribers.Screenshot of Drip Autoresponder: Sending notifications based on customer action is now possible using PushEngage. Create a drip campaign/series of notifications to increase your conversions, leads or click metrics.Screenshot of Cart Abandonment Campaign: Set auto-trigger for an abandoned cart with a single click. Send custom notifications to your customers.Screenshot of Subscription Dialogbox: Settings of Subscription DialogboxScreenshot of Send Notification: Sample notification that was send using PushEngage in the dashboard.