TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Fiorano ESB

    Score2 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A

    iQBus

    N/AN/AiQBus is a cloud-native enterprise service bus (ESB) that helps organizations integrate their business-critical systems — ERP, CRM, e-commerce platforms, databases, and legacy applications — on modern Azure infrastructure. Built by a team with deep roots in Microsoft integration technologies, iQBus was designed specifically for companies facing the end of Microsoft BizTalk Server's lifecycle. Instead of rebuilding integrations from scratch or stitching together dozens of…N/A
    Pricing
    Fiorano ESBiQBus
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Fiorano ESBiQBus
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Fiorano ESBiQBus
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Mule ESB
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Mule ESB
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM DataPower Gateway
    Score9.5 out of 10
    IBM DataPower Gateway
    Score9.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Fiorano ESBiQBus
    Likelihood to Recommend
    2.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Fiorano ESBiQBus
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Fiorano Software
    Fiorano would be a good choice for small-medium businesses that need integration capabilities with clients but don't want to carry the burden of an in-house development team. The software can be used by technical non-developers and the organization offers professional services to get you off the ground. For larger organizations that have an in-house development team and a wealth of internal resources, other "enterprise grade" middleware/ESB solutions may be more applicable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cerebrum City
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    Fiorano Software
    • Fioranio's underlying design is very good. In the event of a sudden shutdown, it would - in theory - be able to recover messages that were in-flight.
    • The visual design surface is very appealing and provides a very quick and easy way to decipher data flows. It has a definite advantage over traditional develop and document processes where documentation tends to be out of date. With Fiorano, the flow is already visualized in a relatively easy to understand way.
    • One thing that Fiorano had over some competitors was connections into our AS400 data queues. Not all middleware solutions have that - which is a boon for organizations that still run an iSeries in the back-end.
    • The support people are generally very well educated and easy to get a hold of if you have a support agreement in place.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cerebrum City
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Fiorano Software
    • Fiorano scalability was a problem for us - specifically we were told about a limit of the number of components that could be run on a single server. This was not explained during the pre-sales and is a serious limitation of the platform.
    • Some of the components in Fiorano are just poorly implemented. For instance, we used the FTP component to download a large multi-GB file. Apparently, that component requires equal RAM to file size. So, if you download a 10GB file, you'll need at least 10GB of RAM to do so.
    • Stability was also problematic for us - some of the components or entire data flows would suddenly stop for no reason. At time they coudln't even be restarted and we were forced to restart the Fiorano service. Not an ideal situation to be in for mission critical data flows.
    • Consistency is a problem for the components in Fiorano. There are wide ranges of design variations in the UI between components. Even in the same component, it could be the case that you'd have to switch back to the "old" component UI to view certain important settings. This made development more difficult.
    • 3rd party support doesn't exist - perhaps it isn't popular enough? There isn't a community supporting Fiorano which means that problems require you to go to a support person.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cerebrum City
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Fiorano Software
    We are evaluating options such as Apache Nifi as a possible replacement for our Fiorano data flows. We've also used PilotFish technologies that has been able to fit the same use cases as Fiorano (minus the visual component). Generally the products mentioned above excelled in areas of stability and through-put compared to Fiorano, but none have been able to consolidate our ESB components into a single platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cerebrum City
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Fiorano Software
    • Fiorano added another piece of complexity to our ESB solution but has not pulled its weight as far as ROI. As we started ramping up on the product, it continued to show it's short-comings and we are working now to ramp it down. Overall, it has not been a positive experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cerebrum City
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots