TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    FitNesse

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AFitNesse is an open source fully integrated standalone wiki web server and acceptance testing framework.N/A
    Pricing
    FitNesse
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FitNesse
    Free Trial
    No
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    FitNesse
    Considered Both Products
    Open Source
    Chose FitNesse
    The FitNesse testing automation framework is very simple to operate. It is simple to connect with the Jenkins and Bamboo environments. It is dependable, and it is simple and quick to include new tests. The process of debugging and fixing test failures is straightforward. …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    FitNesse
    Small Businesses
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FitNesse
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FitNesse
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    Useful and straightforward. Appian and other low-code BCM tools can be easily integrated. Writing a script for a test is similar to writing a script in English. So simple to use because it's a wrapper class for selenium. FitNesse is being implemented with the goal of doing it correctly the first time. As a result, migrations of both the client and the server are made easier.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • Easy to install.
    • Command language is easy to create custom scripts.
    • FitNesse tests are deterministic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • Logging can help any debug or error issues.
    • A Java/Selenium developer is needed to maintain the FitNesse keyword library.
    • Content.txt and properties.txted need to be added to the test suite in older versions to make it visible in a test run.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    The FitNesse testing automation framework is very simple to operate. It is simple to connect with the Jenkins and Bamboo environments. It is dependable, and it is simple and quick to include new tests. The process of debugging and fixing test failures is straightforward. FitNesse, including its installation, may be utilized with a minimum of fuss and difficulty. Maintaining scripts and monitoring their output is designed to be a relatively straightforward process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • It does not necessitate any further setup or configuration.
    • FitNess is an easy-to-use manual QA tool with a comprehensive report that aids stakeholders in better understanding the tested applications.
    • Automated testing suites for a wide range of websites. In addition, it is quite beneficial for the ongoing maintenance of the test library.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots