Fraud.net Email Sheild vs. Risk Proof

Suites will with spams and suspicious mails and links need more improvement on how it works with the option on how to keep or not to keep some mail as some times it deducted some non spam and and suspicious mails as it’s one of them but it always recognised how safe it’s

Incentivized

Risk proof is well suited for quickly finding out potential money laundering [clients] and how much risk would it pose to get into a deal with the client. Risk proof is less suited around some ethical practice assessment of an organization. Such a scenario needs more manual intervention rather than tool assessment.

Incentivized

• Control over spams mails
• Prevention of suspicious mails
• Data safe keep

Incentivized

• Data based visualization
• Open source for data gathering
• Thorough risk assessment

Incentivized

• Detection links within mails
• Optional to keep of not to keep some mails that looks suspicious
• Details on how it operate within my system

Incentivized

• More market reach
• More tools for decision making by boardroom
• Lesser price for more client base

Incentivized

It more generally than the other app as that other one focused on a threaten mails for only one application not for all and doesn’t support mails protection but it’s always more up to date with the new threats and makes me more safe and comfortable while working which helps a lot

Incentivized

It was the tool used in the organization for risk assessment of any potential leads and deals. Before the tool, we used to analyze any risks using manual effort and approach which used to take a lot more man-hours and less reliable quantitative analysis for similar kinds of deals and scenarios.

Incentivized

• Easily to use
• Rarely facing issue
• Always on update with new threats

Incentivized

• Helped determining risks for ongoing deals
• Helped in Decision making process in board meetings
• Negative: Added some cost to the project

Incentivized