GitGuardian vs. Tenable Attack Surface Management
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GitGuardian | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | GitGuardian is an end-to-end NHI security platform designed to help organizations strengthen their Non-Human Identity (NHI) security posture and address compliance standards and regulations. As attackers increasingly target NHIs, such as service accounts, service principals, and applications, protecting and managing these critical assets has become paramount. NHIs rely on “secrets” like API keys and certificates for authentication, and their rapid proliferation has led to significant… | $0 (for individuals or up to 25 devs) |
Tenable Attack Surface Management | Score6.1 out of 10 | N/A | Tenable Attack Surface Management (formerly Tenable.asm, and previously Bit Discovery) is an external attack surface management (EASM) solution that integrates into a vulnerability management platform. Tenable.asm continuously maps the entire internet and discovers connections to internet-facing assets so that users can assess the security posture of the entire external attack surface, or those facets of an organization that face the public, and the Internet. It can be used to access an attack… | N/A |
| GitGuardian | Tenable Attack Surface Management | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| GitGuardian | Tenable Attack Surface Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 23 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 20 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 23 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 19 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 22 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| GitGuardian | Tenable Attack Surface Management | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Intelligence |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| GitGuardian | Tenable Attack Surface Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | GitLab Score8.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | GitLab Score8.9 out of 10 | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | GitLab Score8.9 out of 10 | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| GitGuardian | Tenable Attack Surface Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 10.0 |
| GitGuardian | Tenable Attack Surface Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | GitGuardian Screenshots |






