Google Cloud Bigtable vs. ScyllaDB

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud Bigtable
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Google's Cloud Bigtable is a fully managed, scalable NoSQL database service for large analytical and operational workloads with up to 99.999% availability.
$0.03
per month per GB
ScyllaDB
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
ScyllaDB headquartered in Palo Alto offers Scylla, a NoSQL database alternative to Apache Cassandra available in Enterprise and Cloud DBaaS editions.N/A
Pricing
Google Cloud BigtableScyllaDB
Editions & Modules
Backup Storage
$0.026
per month per GB
HDD storage
$0.026
per month per GB
SSD storage
$0.17
per month per GB
Nodes
$0.65/hour
per month per node (minimum 1 nodes)
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud BigtableScyllaDB
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Cloud BigtableScyllaDB
Considered Both Products
Google Cloud Bigtable
Chose Google Cloud Bigtable
As a hosted solution, that can be managed easily from the Google cloud platform, it enables the teams to think about business use cases vs thinking about the management of the database itself. It is easily to scale it up when you need more throughput or storage. This keeps the …
ScyllaDB
Chose ScyllaDB
Scylla has a quick learning curve (same as Cassandra) compared to other proprietary solutions like BigTable. It supports higher throughput and lower latency that other NoSQL databases like MongoDB, which sacrifice those features for more flexibility and unique features.
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud BigtableScyllaDB
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
Score 9.0 out of 10
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
Score 9.0 out of 10
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud BigtableScyllaDB
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud BigtableScyllaDB
Likelihood to Recommend
Google Bigtable is ONLY suited for massive data sets which scale PetaBytes and TerraBytes. Anything under this can easily be done via dedicated VMs and open source tools. Google Bigtable is expensive and shall be used wisely. It should be utilised only where it is well suited else you would simply be wasting dollars and not utilizing its full benefits.
Read full review
Scylla is well suited for high-throughput scenarios where keyed data must be read or written with consistently low latency. It's less appropriate for use cases requiring relational queries, secondary indexes, or more structured data sets.
Read full review
Pros
  • Analytics: is at Google's heart. No on can beat Google in this space and BigTable is one of its implementation of this. The insights you gain from BigTable are simply usable in your day to day activities and can help you make real difference.
  • Speed: Processing TBs and PBs of data under minutes needs real efficient platform which is capable of doing much more than just processing data. All this data cannot be processed by a single machine, but rather huge pairs of machines working in conjuction with each other. BigTable's implementation is one of the finest and allows you achieve great speeds!
  • Interface: is great. Google has segregated required task under logically placed buttons which takes no time by users to understand and get habituated.
Read full review
  • Low-latency reads
  • CQL has a familiar syntax
  • Parity with Cassandra
  • Practical features
Read full review
Cons
  • Global replication
  • Complete SQL support
  • Size limit of 1MB
Read full review
  • Better documentation for best practices (e.g., how to effectively use connection pooling)
Read full review
Usability
For big IT firms like us, data is very important and it only holds its value if it can make sense to us. Therefore, Bigtable's usability is priceless when it comes to decision making based on data.
Read full review
Very easy-to-understand syntax--uses CQL (same as Cassandra), which has many similarities to standard SQL. There are some gotchas, however, that must be known during schema development.
Read full review
Support Rating
Google provides premium support services for BigTable which is absolutely blazing fast similar to Bigtable's performance.
Read full review
The Scylla cloud support team is incredibly responsive and proactive.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
As a hosted solution, that can be managed easily from the Google cloud platform, it enables the teams to think about business use cases vs thinking about the management of the database itself. It is easily to scale it up when you need more throughput or storage. This keeps the developers and the product folks happy.
Read full review
Scylla has a quick learning curve (same as Cassandra) compared to other proprietary solutions like BigTable. It supports higher throughput and lower latency that other NoSQL databases like MongoDB, which sacrifice those features for more flexibility and unique features.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Building new features that can leverage storage on the edge
  • Realtime decision making
  • Data enrichment
Read full review
  • Addresses latency requirements of our platform
Read full review
ScreenShots