Google Cloud Datastore vs. IBM IMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud Datastore
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Datastore is a NoSQL "schemaless" database as a service, supporting diverse data types. The database is managed; Google manages sharding and replication and prices according to storage and activity.N/A
IBM IMS
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
IBM IMS, for Information Management System, is a database and transaction server.N/A
Pricing
Google Cloud DatastoreIBM IMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud DatastoreIBM IMS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Cloud DatastoreIBM IMS
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Google Cloud DatastoreIBM IMS
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Datastore
10.0
2 Ratings
13% above category average
IBM IMS
-
Ratings
Performance10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Concurrency10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Security10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Data model flexibility10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility9.92 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud DatastoreIBM IMS
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud DatastoreIBM IMS
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(2 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud DatastoreIBM IMS
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
If you want a serverless NoSQL database, no matter it is for personal use, or for company use, Google Cloud Datastore should be on top of your list, especially if you are using Google Cloud as your primary cloud platform. It integrates with all services in the Google Cloud platform.
Read full review
IBM
We have built a database of a network of bank branches with all the needs of security and recovery/restart. It requires knowledge of obsolete maintenance languages and perhaps it is too rigid in the schemes.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Automatically handles shards and replication.
  • Schema-less & NoSQL.
  • Fully managed.
Read full review
IBM
  • Security
  • Reliability
  • Big volume of data and good performance
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • It is hosted on GCP, which makes it harder if your company have multi-cloud strategy.
  • When you want to migrate to other cloud providers, there can be a caveat.
Read full review
IBM
  • Certainly, not being a DB relational penalizes its use
  • It should be more flexible
  • Open up to more recent languages
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
For the amount of use we're getting from Google Cloud Datastore, switching to any other platform would have more cost with little gain. Not having to manage and maintain Google Cloud Datastore for over 4 years has allowed our teams to work on other things. The price is so low that almost any other option for our needs would be far more expensive in time and money.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Google
We selected Google Cloud Datastore as one of our candidates for our NoSQL data is because it is provided by Google Cloud, which fits our needs. Most of our infrastructure is on Google Cloud, so when we think about the NoSQL database, the first thing we thought about is Google Cloud Datastore. And it proves itself.
Read full review
IBM
Essentially, for a question of reliability and scalability, the performance has always been of an enterprise level. The utilities are efficient and effective.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • Simple billing part of Google Cloud Platform
  • No time spent configuring and maintaining Google Cloud Datastore.
  • Very good uptime for our applications.
Read full review
IBM
  • The investment made about 20 years ago that has been fully repaid
  • Reliability and security of investments
  • Unfortunately, it is quite outdated and therefore maintenance costs are higher because the skills are not always available.
Read full review
ScreenShots