Google Cloud IoT vs. ThingWorx

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud IoT
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
The Google Cloud IoT Core is a fully managed service that allows you to easily and securely connect, manage, and ingest data from millions of globally dispersed devices. Cloud IoT Core, in combination with other services on Cloud IoT platform, provides a complete solution for collecting, processing, analyzing, and visualizing IoT data in real time to support improved operational efficiency.N/A
ThingWorx
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
ThingWorx is an IoT and machine-to-machine (M2M) development platform acquired by PTC in 2014 and merged with Axeda Machine Cloud in the same year, to expand PTC's development offerings.N/A
Pricing
Google Cloud IoTThingWorx
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud IoTThingWorx
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Cloud IoTThingWorx
Considered Both Products
Google Cloud IoT

No answer on this topic

ThingWorx
Chose ThingWorx
Google IoT has much easier and tighter integration with GCP and its data analytics capabilities.
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Google Cloud IoTThingWorx
Internet of Things
Comparison of Internet of Things features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud IoT
6.9
2 Ratings
14% below category average
ThingWorx
7.9
7 Ratings
0% below category average
IoT Device Management5.32 Ratings8.47 Ratings
Device Security9.01 Ratings7.97 Ratings
IoT Data Management7.52 Ratings7.56 Ratings
IoT Analytics7.52 Ratings7.37 Ratings
IoT Integration5.42 Ratings8.17 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud IoTThingWorx
Small Businesses
AWS IoT Core
AWS IoT Core
Score 7.7 out of 10
AWS IoT Core
AWS IoT Core
Score 7.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
AWS IoT Core
AWS IoT Core
Score 7.7 out of 10
AWS IoT Core
AWS IoT Core
Score 7.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud IoTThingWorx
Likelihood to Recommend
6.3
(2 ratings)
8.7
(10 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud IoTThingWorx
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
I consider myself very techy and found Google Cloud IoT platform very challenging to manage. The lack of tutorials and discussions to understand how each section works is very challenging. I specifically made a connection after several hours to Google Nest to third-party integration, Home Assistant. Shortly after Google Cloud upgraded to a new version breaking the connection. This was extremely frustrating. No service should take several hours to figure out, in my opinion, if it does, the platform is doing a poor job of making it easy. I'm personally very discouraged any time I ever have to use this platform. It's very hard to find answers.
Read full review
PTC
It is well suited for situations where you require an end-to-end platform for pushing code and managing data and security of the IoT application. However, it is not well suited for the case when you want to scale the app up to many users and this requires more from the part of the product.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Integration with different brands of microcontrollers including the one currently used by Espresiff.
  • The platform is very robust and secure.
Read full review
PTC
  • Asset Monitoring - quick and easy to deploy, can connect to the plant floor and get real-time data from devices.
  • Analytics - The TWX Analytics extension has a variety of analyses that can be done into any data source input into TWX.
  • Alerts notification - you can program alerts to be sent via email/SMS seamlessly.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Not beginner friendly.
  • Needs more tutorials and walk throughs on how to get started.
  • Very complicated and unless you know what you are doing you will be lost.
  • Lack of material found on how to do each section / services.
Read full review
PTC
  • Advanced functionality in control and data visualization often requires additional coding from the user.
  • Support and tutorials provided are often lacking in detail or are not readily transferable.
  • Mashup development works poorly on small monitors or laptops.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
No answers on this topic
PTC
We started more than a year ago and do not plan to replace it
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
PTC
Experienced and knowledgeable customer support executives, Thingworx is a very large product and contains a myriad of features which is not easy to remember without enough training or hands-on experience
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
Although comparisons are hateful, even more so when we are talking about leading brands where the quality of their services are indisputable, the general environment of Google was more familiar to me since I use, for example, Google Firebase on a daily basis, where part of the concepts are similar, without Without a doubt, AWS services are excellent, but it was easier for me to go through the functions of Google Cloud IoT.
Read full review
PTC
Well-suited - multiple streams from many data sources, highly scalable application scenarios.Good for a quick test of internet of things (IoT) connectivity and for deploying access via the web. Smooth deployment, easy to couple to devices. Easy cooperation with Splunk, which we use also.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • The amount of hours to get things integrated is negative.
  • The amount of hours researching how to get devices integrated is negative.
  • Overall the amount of time and effort getting things working has been a negative experience.
Read full review
PTC
  • Good for quick deployment of customer specific control of IoT
  • Good for quick test of IoT platform
  • Difficult to debug complicate system
Read full review
ScreenShots