TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Google Endpoint Management vs. Parallels Device Management

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google Endpoint Management

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Endpoint Management is a UEM / MDM solution that controls access to company Google Workspaces, and provides security functionality for Android and iOS mobile devices, as well as Windows and macOS accessing resources or tools remotely. Features include screen or device lock, remote data wipe, limiting access based on device type or user, remote user logout, and centralized management of devices through a Google Workspace admin console. There is no cost for Google Endpoint…

    $6

    per month

    Parallels Device Management

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AParallels Device Management enables users to centrally administer PCs, iPhones and iPads, including Mac management, with a simple plug-in. The vendor states the solution: Extends Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (MECM) for unified device administration. Improves IT performance, reducing duplicate work and incident resolution time. Is straightforward to deploy, requiring no additional infrastructure or training.N/A
    Pricing
    Google Endpoint ManagementParallels Device Management
    Editions & Modules
    Google Workspace - Business Starter
    $6
    Per User / Per Month
    Google Workspace - Business Standard
    $12
    Per User / Per Month
    Google Workspace - Business Plus
    $18
    Per User / Per Month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google Endpoint ManagementParallels Device Management
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Google Endpoint ManagementParallels Device Management
    Small Businesses
    Avast CloudCare
    Score10 out of 10
    Avast CloudCare
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Action1
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Action1
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Score9 out of 10
    ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Google Endpoint ManagementParallels Device Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Google Endpoint ManagementParallels Device Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    Google Endpoint securely manages data, more so the sensitive one, by developing passwords that are strong and complex. Further, Google Endpoint remotely updates or installs software and other details. For purposes of synchronization, Google Endpoint is adequately available and helpful. Lastly, has a utility management scope, and the deployment process is simplistic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Parallels
    We had a medium size fleet of macbook pros that we had deployed and had parallels already installed on them. We looked into a way to standardize and track these devices and started looking into Parallels as a solution to help us with this. Parallels was a good fit due to the fact that most of these machines already had the base system already installed
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • Google Endpoint has a network support system that is wireless.
    • Further, there is remote installation or update from Google Endpoint.
    • Lastly, Google Endpoint manages data without compromise or setbacks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Parallels
    • Central location for management via Webv
    • Existing ecosystem for our mac users
    • Trust and transparent set up from normal operations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • Google Endpoint lacks proper online templates, for training.
    • Google Endpoint is not a flexible or configurable application unless the developer does.
    • Google Endpoint consumes some system space, making the device load much.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Parallels
    • It can be a bit difficult with a large fleet of computers
    • Can be a bit hard to troubleshoot if there are issues
    • There are other tools that are cheaper that do the same thing albeit not as well
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    Google Endpoint has a remote control, which simplifies tasks, and it's not a must for a person to install the software on the required device. Also, Google Endpoint has a free version, and the monthly subscription amount is small. The training and installation process are all fair, effective, and effortless
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Parallels
    We looked at a product called virtual box to do something similar to what we saw from Parallels but it was much more manual for us to deploy out the tool and we would have had to do a lot more work to manage all the systems we have in the fleet
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • Data safety is one of the perfect returns from Google Endpoint.
    • Inventory management ensures proper use of the company's resources.
    • Automatic installations and updates saves on time and expenses.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Parallels
    • Easy to deploy out to our fleet
    • quick turn around time to provision with parallels
    • ease of use from end user perspective
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots