Flutter by Google vs. Jotform Apps

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Flutter
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Flutter is an open-source mobile application development framework created by Google. It is used to develop applications for Android and iOS, as well as being the primary method of creating applications for Google Fuchsia.
$0
Jotform Apps
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Jotform’s no-code app builder, available to start for free, lets users add forms, widgets, products, and branding to one fully customized app that can be downloaded onto any smartphone, tablet, or computer. To accelerate development it includes 300+ ready-made templates. And it features an online store builder to sell products and receive payments with 25+ payment gateways support.N/A
Pricing
Flutter by GoogleJotform Apps
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FlutterJotform Apps
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Flutter by GoogleJotform Apps
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Flutter by GoogleJotform Apps
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Flutter by Google
-
Ratings
Jotform Apps
8.3
4 Ratings
7% below category average
Platform Security00 Ratings8.34 Ratings
Platform User Management00 Ratings8.34 Ratings
Reusability00 Ratings8.54 Ratings
Platform Scalability00 Ratings8.34 Ratings
No-Code Development
Comparison of No-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Flutter by Google
-
Ratings
Jotform Apps
7.4
4 Ratings
14% below category average
No Coding Required00 Ratings9.54 Ratings
Collaborative App Development00 Ratings7.24 Ratings
Visual Data Modeling00 Ratings6.04 Ratings
Framework Integration00 Ratings7.73 Ratings
Multi-Channel Deployment00 Ratings6.54 Ratings
Managed Hosting00 Ratings7.73 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Flutter by GoogleJotform Apps
Small Businesses
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Flutter by GoogleJotform Apps
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(17 ratings)
6.8
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
Flutter by GoogleJotform Apps
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Flutter is well known for native app development, if you have android studio installed on your system, you can quickly start using it. This might not be the best choice for you if you do not wish to learn a new language, i.e. Dart and you do not know it already.
Read full review
Jotform
Jotform Apps work well if you want to offer your users a feedback form, for instance, along with some useful links. For businesses that don't have a solid responsive website, an app would be a way to display basic information and offer some interaction in a mobile-friendly way.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • User interface design works great across all platforms, including native styling for iOS/macOS.
  • Native compilation for mobile platforms and a decent rendering engine results in slick apps that can make the most of your device.
  • Dart is a well thought out language and easy to pick up.
  • Makes cross-platform development of good looking GUI apps a doddle.
Read full review
Jotform
  • It provides wide range of templates to choose from
  • Provides customization within an app according to your need
  • Drag and drop features makes it less time consuming
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Occasionally updates to the Flutter SDK result in wide-sweeping changes that seem to not be thoroughly tested and considered. Flutter sometimes evolves too fast for its own good.
  • While the 3rd-party Flutter package ecosystem is vast and rich, 1st-party support for basic things (audio/video playback, battery information, Bluetooth services, etc.) are lacking. You are occasionally forced to rely on an open-source package for use-cases that other platforms have native support for.
  • Documentation, particularly around testing, is lacking. While there are some great docs, like the Dart Style Guide, many Flutter-focused support documents are lacking in quality and real-world usability.
  • Flutter allows you to architect an app however you want. While this is a great feature, it also adds complexity and leads to the current state of Flutter's state management, where there are 50+ options on how to organize your app, with very little official guidance or recommendations from the Flutter team. For a beginner, this can create decision paralysis.
Read full review
Jotform
  • Too rudimentary for multi step integrations
  • Tool will be out grown
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
I have experience with react and React Native. I would say that the idea behind all those frameworks are quite similar. However, I found the javascript-based frameworks a bit more accessible as you could utilise your javascript knowledge. Here, Flutter works with its own language. This has advantages and disadvantages sometimes. I found the community around javascript frameworks bigger and therefore sometimes more helpful. However, Flutter does a good job here as well. I think the main argument for Flutter is its usability for less experienced developers. If you do not have knowledge in javascript or other programming languages then I think it is much easier to start with Flutter than with another framework like react. I think the package that you get form scratch is better than in the other frameworks were you have to set up and learn a lot more before you can start.
Read full review
Jotform
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • The rapid development capabilities of Flutter allow us to build apps we could not have previously considered commercially viable, opening new revenue streams.
  • Free and open licensing made adoption very easy (ie. free/low cost!).
  • In comparison to Qt, our time spent arguing with build tools and perfecting development environments has decreased substantially.
Read full review
Jotform
  • This improved our engagement with attendees.
  • We used this to capture feedback that was important to our planning.
  • The ease of building apps made this possible. We wouldn't have been able to provide a natively coded app.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Jotform Apps Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of