Flutter by Google vs. Swiftify

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Flutter
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Flutter is an open-source mobile application development framework created by Google. It is used to develop applications for Android and iOS, as well as being the primary method of creating applications for Google Fuchsia.N/A
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
When Apple rolled out Swift back in 2014, Objective-C was set to be replaced. Even nowadays, however, there are plenty of apps and projects that still use Objective-C, and developers are faced with the prospect of either starting again from scratch or attempting to convert them to Swift. Swiftify for Xcode is designed to automate much of the conversion process, handling the task of replacing syntax while letting you focus on other aspects of migrating your project to…
$5
per file
Pricing
Flutter by GoogleSwiftify
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Pay As You Go
$5
per file
Cloud 30 (Monthly)
$49
30 files per month
Cloud 100 (Monthly)
$99
100 files per month
Cloud 300 (Monthly)
$199
300 files per month
Cloud 1000 (Monthly)
$299
1000 files per month
Cloud 30 (Yearly)
$399
300 files per year
Cloud 100 (Yearly)
$799
1000 files per year
Cloud 300 (Yearly)
$1,599
3000 files per year
Cloud 1000 (Yearly)
$2,399
10000 files per year
Offline Converter
custom pricing
per seat
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FlutterSwiftify
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Flutter by GoogleSwiftify
Considered Both Products
Flutter
Chose Flutter
Each technologies listed have their own use case. It is important to understand your own requirements before starting with any technology. Although all four (React Native, Meteor Js, Ionic & Flutter by Google) solves the same problem of cross-platform development, Flutter by …
Chose Flutter
In React Native, app sometimes breaks as it relies on system components, but Flutter is more stable.
Chose Flutter
Flutter is well documented and powered by Google. Flutter's user interface and user experience is slightly better than React Native.
Chose Flutter
I have experience with react and react native. I would say that the idea behind all those frameworks are quite similar.
However, I found the javascript-based frameworks a bit more accessible as you could utilise your javascript knowledge. Here, Flutter works with its own …
Chose Flutter
I have used Flutter for cross-platform applications which are unique in the tech industry, I like the user interface created with Flutter.
Chose Flutter
- Like it better than other solutions, or building native on both platforms.
- React Native has a good advantage with language and amazing web support.
- React Native is easier to jump in for web engineers.
Chose Flutter
I have not used Dev Express Universal and Selenium Web Driver much besides in the demos that were provided to our company. We compared the demos and went with Google Flutter because it worked well and looked noticeably better than the other products. While I am unsure of the …
Chose Flutter
Flutter is a bit different from Android Studio, the latter one being an Integrated Development Environment (IDE) while Flutter itself is a Cross-Platform Mobile Development SDK (Software Development Kit). Flutter provides the access to the native features and built-in plugins …
Chose Flutter
I selected Flutter because of Flutter's awesome, pre-build UI components. It makes my life as an indie dev easy and fun. At the time, I had never built an application with React Native, so this was a fantastic introduction to cross-platform development. That said, as someone …
Chose Flutter
I think that Flutter is now much better than Microsoft's Xamarin and the old Apache Cordova. I was able to go from a concept design to a working application in almost no time and with almost no experience with Dart at all. It helps (but it is not a requirement) to have some …
Chose Flutter
Way less tweaking to have a cross-platform experience, better performance, and feels more like a native app.
But the community, while growing, is still smaller than React Native. This can cause issues with specific use cases as it's harder to find help online.
Chose Flutter
React Native seemed like a comparable and equally valid choice to Flutter. Performance, ease of development, and support are roughly equal between the two products. Dart, to me, felt easier to work with than Javascript or Typescript. Flutter SDK tools and VSCode extensions made …
Chose Flutter
The app generated by Flutter doesn't change upon OS versions as in native apps or other cross-platform apps. The running speed of apps is much faster than its competitors like react-native and Cordova. It's lightweight and faster to compare to other cross-platform. The hot …
Chose Flutter
The main alternative to Flutter I have experience with, is Qt framework. For a long time, Qt was the go-to if you wanted a cross platform desktop application, probably written in C++ or Python, that could take on the 'look and feel' of the target platform. However, Qt is …
Swiftify
Chose Swiftify
This is the only product that I use when I convert codes. So far I'm happy and will stick with it.
Chose Swiftify
There's not much to compare - we haven't found any proprietary like it. Existing OpenSource solutions are unmaintained and Swiftify supports the latest versions of Swift.
Chose Swiftify
Swiftify tries to convert the code even if the code can not be executed in a real situation.
I chose Swiftify because most of the times you just need to convert one line, one method... That of course, it is using and used by other code that you didn't add in the conversion code, …
Best Alternatives
Flutter by GoogleSwiftify
Small Businesses
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Jotform
Jotform
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Jotform
Jotform
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Appium
Appium
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Flutter by GoogleSwiftify
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Flutter by GoogleSwiftify
Likelihood to Recommend
Flutter is well known for native app development, if you have android studio installed on your system, you can quickly start using it. This might not be the best choice for you if you do not wish to learn a new language, i.e. Dart and you do not know it already.
Read full review
For me as a picky person I never used the file convertor but for a small portion of code, it is good. With the classes that have more than one initializer, it got confusing and I had to dig to find the exact issue to fix.
Read full review
Pros
  • It is powered by Google, so a great technical community is backing it.
  • The development of native apps is an easy process using Flutter.
  • As it is an open-source tool, we can use it without paying anything.
  • It provides nice UI options.
Read full review
  • Put in your Objective-C code, select the version of Swift language to convert, click convert. That's all!
  • Swiftify is now creating a platform to convert Objective C to #C, something that can help for different development projects platforms.
  • Swiftify offers a few free converts to try to show you the power of it. Their price for a subscription plan is really good for big projects.
Read full review
Cons
  • Occasionally updates to the Flutter SDK result in wide-sweeping changes that seem to not be thoroughly tested and considered. Flutter sometimes evolves too fast for its own good.
  • While the 3rd-party Flutter package ecosystem is vast and rich, 1st-party support for basic things (audio/video playback, battery information, Bluetooth services, etc.) are lacking. You are occasionally forced to rely on an open-source package for use-cases that other platforms have native support for.
  • Documentation, particularly around testing, is lacking. While there are some great docs, like the Dart Style Guide, many Flutter-focused support documents are lacking in quality and real-world usability.
  • Flutter allows you to architect an app however you want. While this is a great feature, it also adds complexity and leads to the current state of Flutter's state management, where there are 50+ options on how to organize your app, with very little official guidance or recommendations from the Flutter team. For a beginner, this can create decision paralysis.
Read full review
  • It lacks general performance and availability
  • It doesn't handle Objective-C macro well
  • Overall conversion speed expected to be much better
Read full review
Usability
Flutter by Google is very easy to start with. The initial setup they provide is very helpful and easy to understand. The default project setup is also good and can be deployed to production without changing much. Flutter by Google provides a huge library of components, which are created and tested by their own team, making the development of application much faster and robust. Flutter by Google also has a huge community support where we can find components built by the community and we can contribute our own components as well, which helps in faster dev time. Applications developed using Flutter by Google are very smooth, almost feels like native, which helps in creating good impression on customers/clients.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
There are constant upgrades to improve the conversion.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Each technologies listed have their own use case. It is important to understand your own requirements before starting with any technology. Although all four (React Native, Meteor Js, Ionic & Flutter by Google) solves the same problem of cross-platform development, Flutter by Google excels in creating a smooth/fast experience for end-user/customer due to its own rendering engine. Where as other technologies have to use a bridge between Js and Native APIs or use the browser engine to run the app, which makes them less smooth/slower than Flutter by Google. So if you need that quick response from client as well as cross-platform application, Flutter by Google could be your go to tech.
Read full review
Swiftify tries to convert the code even if the code can not be executed in a real situation. I chose Swiftify because most of the times you just need to convert one line, one method... That of course, it is using and used by other code that you didn't add in the conversion code, but you just need to convert that for now. In this situation, Swiftify converts the code, other ones such as iSwift will report an error in the code and will not convert it.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The rapid development capabilities of Flutter allow us to build apps we could not have previously considered commercially viable, opening new revenue streams.
  • Free and open licensing made adoption very easy (ie. free/low cost!).
  • In comparison to Qt, our time spent arguing with build tools and perfecting development environments has decreased substantially.
Read full review
  • good ROI, saves a lot of time.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Swiftify Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of