Hireflix vs. InterviewStream Prep

I think Hireflix is particularly well-suited for companies that have a lot of candidates applying to a position and they want to do screening interviews with dozens of candidates but don't have time to arrange for in-person calls with each candidate. Before Hireflix, I would spend 30min per candidate screening (10min scheduling the interview and 20min on the interview) and now I spend 5min (1min emailing the Hireflix link and 4min watching the interview on 2-3x speed).

We have found it great with students BUT you have to require students to use it! They don't use it on their own. No matter how often you tell them it is great!

Incentivized

• Accelerates our hiring processes and increases the number of candidates we can manage. We optimize our time and are more effective to hire in less time.
• It also serves us in employee hiring processes that are difficult to organize a face-to-face or online meetings.
• Above all, we value that it allows us to manage a greater volume of employee hiring processes in an orderly manner .

• Gives practice recording answers to interview questions - which happens more often in actual searches.
• Provides sample questions for specific career fields.
• Allows candidates to get feedback from others.

Incentivized

• Stats for each process could be deeper.

• I would like videos I could send to candidates to help the understand how to use InterviewStream and its effectiveness.

Incentivized

Hireflix is super simple and easy-to-use. It's very fast to get started and isn't nearly as complicated as the competition. I think for companies that want a fast, easy solution to screening lots of candidates, you can't beat Hireflix.

• Has allowed us to continue our operations in an all-remote setting.
• Has reduced the time it has taken us to evaluate projects by more than half.