HttpMaster vs. TestingBot

If you're looking for a tool for building and running integration tests for API apps or other website/web services, HttpMaster is the way to go. A nice feature it offers is a free version, so you can see if it'll suit your needs before paying for it. An instance where it may not be the best option is if you're needing to build and run security tests, or requirements-based testing.

Incentivized

Before, I received a lot of bad feedback from my users because my site was not compatible with certain browsers and operating systems. but now with TestingBot I can automatically test my website with the most used systems and fix these bugs and avoid losing customers. TestingBot integrates with the most popular continuous integration platforms such as Jenkins, TeamCity, GitHub Actions, and more. The browser and device grid are compatible with Selenium, Appium, Cypress, and other frameworks.

Incentivized

• Debugging
• Pipeline Run
• Prod-testing

Incentivized

• Automatically test my website on many browsers and operating systems.
• Generate a video for each test.
• Test my site live and manually on any browser and OS from the cloud.

Incentivized

• Introductory tutorials/examples/training.
• MacOS support.
• Json formatting support.

Incentivized

• Add other frameworks such as Symfony for PHP.

Incentivized

HttpMaster supports the maximum scrips and browser and provides assurance on different use cases to be tested

Incentivized

I chose TestingBot because it is easier to install on my site as well if you compare it with other testing services that I have known. Also, the live interactive testing is very fluid with TestingBot which was not the case with the other tools.

Incentivized

• Increased efficiency -- from ease of use.
• Increased reliability -- from more thorough tests.
• Automated test suites.

Incentivized

• Reduce bugs on my website UI.
• Adapt the UI of my site to as many systems/OS/devices as possible.

Incentivized