Hydra vs. Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Hydra
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Hydra is a password cracking tool used for penetration testing.N/A
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is an automated, all-in-one mobile application (Android/iOS/Windows) pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. MobSF support mobile app binaries (APK, IPA & APPX) along with zipped source code and provides REST APIs for integration with CI/CD or DevSecOps pipeline. The Dynamic Analyzer helps you to perform runtime security assessment and interactive instrumented testing.N/A
Pricing
HydraMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HydraMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
HydraMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.5 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.5 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
HydraMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
HydraMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
One scenario that fits well Hydra's ability is to test the strength of Drupal usernames and passwords. So, as an example, if we have a Drupal site at some HTTP web address, we could use lots of methods in order to collect a list with some valid users. After we create the list and also the list of some possible passwords we can try to initiate a Hydra brute force attack. Hydra for example is not suited for finding the vulnerabilities of a host, for this other solutions can be used.
Read full review
Open Source
MobSF is good for checking for vulnerabilities in your app. It will also give suggestions on how to address them. Another thing is can do is find code that may be incorrect. It is not, however, a substitute for a system that actually checks your code for proper use. It really is concentrated on security.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • One of most important thing is that Hydra's ability to perform HTTP post form attacks.
  • The tool also can be used to attack a great number of protocols.
  • The source code of the tool/software is also available for others (so it is not a closed source one).
  • A good thing about this tool is also the support available and it also has a high ranking on GitHub (over 1000 stars).
Read full review
Open Source
  • Scan for vulnerabilities
  • Scan for bad coding
  • Give suggestions on fixes for security issues
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • It is not a straightforward tool to use, it needs certain dependencies to be installed so it can function as intended by its creators. This is one of the most important steps that need to be done while configuring the tool as one needs.
  • Sometimes the tool gives False Positives passwords.
  • There are some issues in the functionality of the tool itself (like some bugs, for example affecting the running and hanging process after a number of tries), but most of them have a solution and there is big community support for the tool.
Read full review
Open Source
  • The UI is not that user friendly
  • The documentation could be easier to understand
  • An easier method of deploying MobSF would be appreciated
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
There are many other tools similar to Hydra, one of them being "John the Ripper ". Notable differences are that while John the Ripper works offline, Hydra works online; also Hydra is more popular and with a wider usage as it supports Windows, Linux, and macOSX. An important thing is that both software are free to use, making both very useful tools. We can note that JTR has also a "pro" version that is not free to use and it is more optimized for speed and performance and focused on a specific operating system, while Hydra is free and offers all features at no cost.
Read full review
Open Source
In my opinion, MobSF is not as comprehensive as SonarQube. Both, however, do a very good job in scanning your code for vulnerabilities. Both do roughly the same things. The reports of SonarQube are more detailed though. The advantage that MobSF has over SonarQube is the price. One is free while the other is a paid solution (with several tiers). However, we use them together to get a more comprehensive scan.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Our business objectives are accomplished using the tool as Hydra covers our needs for a free password cracking tool.
  • The tool is a free one that has a lot of advantages because it is a powerful one to use for the specific task of performing some activities that are related to penetration testing.
  • The services that our business provides for several clients in the field of penetration testing are at the level our customers are expecting.
Read full review
Open Source
  • It has allowed our apps to pass a security vetting requirement of a third party to deploy our app
  • We can see where we can improve on the development of our app
  • The deployment can take a while, especially with teams not familiar with the software
Read full review
ScreenShots