Hygraph vs. Strapi

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Hygraph
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Hygraph (previously GraphCMS) is a native GraphQL Headless Content Management System (CMS) and now evolved as a Federated Content Platform, enabling teams across the world to unify, structure, enrich and distribute content from anywhere to anywhere.
$299
per month
Strapi
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Strapi is an open-source software platform that helps developers to easily build, deploy, and manage APIs.N/A
Pricing
HygraphStrapi
Editions & Modules
Professional
$299
per month per project
Scale
$899
per month per project
Enterprise
Custom
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HygraphStrapi
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details35% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HygraphStrapi
Considered Both Products
Hygraph
Chose Hygraph
We picked GraphCMS since it used Graph API and easily integrated it into our Gatsby website. It was also cheap (free) and easy to test out the product, making it easier to prove to our company we should pay for the product in the long run. Lastly, it seems to have a bunch of …
Strapi

No answer on this topic

Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
HygraphStrapi
Hybrid CMS
Comparison of Hybrid CMS features of Product A and Product B
Hygraph
8.7
1 Ratings
20% above category average
Strapi
-
Ratings
Collaborative editing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content templates10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Approval and authoring workflows8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Hygraph
-
Ratings
Strapi
10.0
1 Ratings
22% above category average
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Hygraph
-
Ratings
Strapi
10.0
1 Ratings
26% above category average
API00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Hygraph
-
Ratings
Strapi
9.0
1 Ratings
17% above category average
WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Admin section00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Page templates00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Hygraph
-
Ratings
Strapi
8.7
1 Ratings
17% above category average
SEO support00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Community / comment management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
HygraphStrapi
Small Businesses
Contentful
Contentful
Score 8.2 out of 10
Divi
Divi
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
Image Relay
Image Relay
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
HygraphStrapi
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
HygraphStrapi
Likelihood to Recommend
Hygraph
I would recommend GraphCMS to anyone who is also using Gatsby to build their website. If not, I would recommend them to consider GraphCMS but also consider other options. GraphCMS is a tool in which you are responsible to make the most out of it, but sometimes this requires more time and knowledge than a normal engineer may be able to handle. But with more time and attention, the reward of off-lifting content creation from the developers is a huge time saver in the long run.
Read full review
Strapi
1. If a headless CMS is needed. 2. Need the cms UI to be clean. 3. There is a need for customization options in the UI and API as well. 4. Expertise in javascript and need cms with node js backend. 5. Want auth APIs pre-made. 6. Easy to customize the backend as well. 7. The user interface can be fully customizable.
Read full review
Pros
Hygraph
  • GraphCMS is easy to work with from the "non-engineer" side of things.
  • GraphCMS is very flexible on what data models we can create and how those models are formed.
  • GraphCMS uses Graph API, which is easy to write (compared to older API patterns).
Read full review
Strapi
  • Free and open source.
  • CMS UI is nice and clean.
  • Customization options.
  • Regular updates and bug fixes.
  • Easy to find and understand docs.
  • Blogs available to learn more.
  • Plugin eco system.
Read full review
Cons
Hygraph
  • GraphCMS is very expensive at the enterprise level.
  • GraphCMS requires deep knowledge of the system and requires lots of time to be efficient with it (especially around creating specific data patterns/relationships).
  • Multiple times a day, the system will give us errors when attempting to save something but the errors are unclear as to what went wrong (can be irritating).
Read full review
Strapi
  • Tutorial videos.
  • Use typescript for it's backend.
  • Detailed explanation of commands available.
  • More clear docs for releasing.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Hygraph
We picked GraphCMS since it used Graph API and easily integrated it into our Gatsby website. It was also cheap (free) and easy to test out the product, making it easier to prove to our company we should pay for the product in the long run. Lastly, it seems to have a bunch of support from other developers which makes us confident will be around for a while (and we won't need to replace it anytime soon). Note: I also looked at Directus and DatoCMS but these were not options within TrustRadius
Read full review
Strapi
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Hygraph
  • Better use of time for our engineers in the long run.
  • More control of content for people outside of the engineer team.
  • Allows people to edit the content on their own, so they don't need to wait until a developer is available to add something to the website.
Read full review
Strapi
  • Easy to setup.
  • Customize the ui.
  • Increased productivity.
  • Get prebuilt auth apis.
  • Customize the backend and add new apis.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Strapi Screenshots

Screenshot of Content Type BuilderScreenshot of Content Manager edit layoutScreenshot of Content Type builder contents with groupsScreenshot of Content Manager Layout ViewScreenshot of Content Manager List view