IBM CICS Transaction Server vs. SYSVIEW Performance Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM CICS Transaction Server
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
IBM CICS (Customer Information Control System) is mixed-language application server that runs on IBM z/OS. CICS® Transaction Server, often called CICS, is used for hosting transactional enterprise applications in a hybrid architecture.N/A
SYSVIEW Performance Management
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
SYSVIEW performance management from Broadcom is a mainframe monitoring solution providing unified real-time visibility into mainframe application performance and transaction flows enable easier analysis between captures.N/A
Pricing
IBM CICS Transaction ServerSYSVIEW Performance Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM CICS Transaction ServerSYSVIEW Performance Management
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM CICS Transaction ServerSYSVIEW Performance Management
Considered Both Products
IBM CICS Transaction Server
Chose IBM CICS Transaction Server
IBM CICS Transaction Server product works well in conjunction with IBM DB2 and they go together very well. Both are equally scalable and reliable products to use. They both can handle very large numbers of transactions and have been around for decades and stood for times and …
Chose IBM CICS Transaction Server
There is no comparison, in practice, the possibility of using the latest programming languages but, above all, the databases can be different and more modern than DL1.
SYSVIEW Performance Management
Chose SYSVIEW Performance Management
SYSVIEW replaced TMON. Today it seems like a good choice. We tried OMEGAMON and just couldn't get it to work the way we liked.
Features
IBM CICS Transaction ServerSYSVIEW Performance Management
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
IBM CICS Transaction Server
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
SYSVIEW Performance Management
-
Ratings
IDE support5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM CICS Transaction ServerSYSVIEW Performance Management
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM CICS Transaction ServerSYSVIEW Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM CICS Transaction ServerSYSVIEW Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
The strengths of CICS are certainly the scalability. The multilevel architecture of the CICS regions, security, and performance, manages to manage large volumes of transactions with efficient performances.
Read full review
Any z/OS monitoring. I don't know of any performance monitoring scenario where it doesn't excel.
Read full review
Pros
  • De facto standard in the legacy enterprise
  • Multiplatform connection
  • Native connection with DB2
Read full review
  • Show system Status
  • Show DASD status
  • Show USS details
Read full review
Cons
  • Would like to see the transaction response matrix on the average transaction response among all requests.
  • Would like to see GUI tool to be able to see currently running transactions
  • Would like to be able to get the details of where the cics transaction was triggered from
Read full review
  • Non that I know of
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM CICS Transaction Server product works well in conjunction with IBM Db2 and they go together very well. Both are equally scalable and reliable products to use. They both can handle very large numbers of transactions and have been around for decades and stood for times and have great experience by those who have used it.
Read full review
SYSVIEW replaced TMON. Today it seems like a good choice. We tried OMEGAMON and just couldn't get it to work the way we liked.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has allowed us to use our decades old code and still continue to support the business
  • Allows us to have faster time to market and modernize our systems
  • We can still continue to use our legacy resources for modern systems
Read full review
  • It makes finding performance problems quick and easy
Read full review
ScreenShots