TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM Cloud Pak for Applications vs. Pichon

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Cloud Pak for Applications

    Score7.2 out of 10
    N/AIBM Cloud Pak® for Applications (CP4Apps) is an end-to-end hybrid cloud application platform, providing flexibility for deployments, building new cloud-native applications, refactoring and re-platforming existing applications. Designed to leverage a collection of application runtimes, modernization tools and a Kubernetes container platform to adapt to their landscape needs.N/A

    Pichon

    N/AN/A140,000+ icons in 33 popular styles in one desktop application. Various colors and sizes. Drag-and-drop to any design tool. The icons are customizable and consistent. Available in many sizes and formats: • Sizes from 25x25 to 500x500 px • Formats PNG, ICO, SVG, PDF, EPS, XAML What you can do with Pichon: • Search by keywords or browse by category or style • Recolor all the icons in a few clicks • Have all the icons at hand any time…

    $0

    per user / mo

    Pricing
    IBM Cloud Pak for ApplicationsPichon
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Free plan
    $0.00
    per user / mo
    Free plan
    $0.00
    per user / mo
    Icons
    $19.00
    per 100 downloads / mo
    Icons
    $19.00
    per 100 downloads / mo
    Full set
    $49.00
    100 icons, 50 photos, 25 vectors and 15 tracks / mo
    Full set
    $49.00
    100 icons, 50 photos, 25 vectors and 15 tracks / mo
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM Cloud Pak for ApplicationsPichon
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—$0.20/icon after the limit
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    IBM Cloud Pak for ApplicationsPichon
    Small Businesses
    NativeScript
    Score4.8 out of 10
    NativeScript
    Score4.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    SAP Extension Suite (discontinued)
    Score8.4 out of 10
    SAP Extension Suite (discontinued)
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM Cloud Pak for ApplicationsPichon
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.2
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM Cloud Pak for ApplicationsPichon
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    Well suited for customers who are looking for cloud-adoption, and finally to meet the challenges of business innovation for the competitive advantage through DevOps.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Icons8 LLC
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    IBM
    • Provides a fantastic range of Application runtimes allowing the most suitable runtime to be selected for the app being implemented.
    • After using Transformation Advisor for quite a while, it is an indispensable tool to help modernize, specifically from WebSphere and Tomcat, towards the lightweight, fast and efficient Liberty runtime.
    • The simplicity of the licensing by wrapping many products into a single offering with a different VPC weighting.
    • Allows us to modernize our runtime from WebSphere Application Server (or ND) to WebSphere Liberty core without sacrificing our WAS licenses.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Icons8 LLC
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    IBM
    • User Experience and Learning Curve
    • Integration with Third-party Tools
    • Pricing and Licensing Model
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Icons8 LLC
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    Our customer mission-critical core banking applications like Temenos T24 run on best of the breed IBM WebSphere Application Server which is java based-application server. IBM has kept up the promise of providing support, fixpack, and any update. As far as I know, at least by 2030, IBM is committed to continue with WHE which gives customers confidence in their current investments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Icons8 LLC
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • We have been able to migrate apps away from the expensive WAS-ND to the more cost-effective WAS-base without throwing away our WAS-ND licenses. With a 1:4 ratio of WAS-ND to WAS-base we've been able to we've been able to save in excess of 75% on licensing charges for these apps.
    • By having a license model based on VPC ratios (1:4:8 - WAS-ND:WAS-base:Liberty core) we've been able to move away from using license pooling resulting in over-allocating (i.e. wasting) CPU cores for each license pool, to using consolidated license pools hosting a combination of WAS-ND, WAS-base and Liberty-core. This has allowed us to reduce our licensing costs accordingly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Icons8 LLC
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots

    Pichon Screenshots

    Screenshot of Pichon