Invited by the Vendor
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Confluent | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments. | $385 per month |
| IBM Confluent | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| IBM Confluent | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
94% Would buy again 17 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
94% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
86% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 12 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
88% Implementation went as expected 15 Answers | |
| IBM Confluent | |
|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon SNS Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon SNS Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Google Cloud Pub/Sub Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Confluent | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.6 |
| Usability | 7.4 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 |
| IBM Confluent | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Usability |
|
| Support Rating |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
| ScreenShots |