TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM DevOps Deploy vs. OpenText Operations Orchestration

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM DevOps Deploy

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AA solution for continuous delivery of any application to any environment, and an application-release solution that infuses automation into the continuous delivery and continuous deployment (CI/CD) process and provides robust visibility, traceability and auditing capabilities.N/A

    OpenText Operations Orchestration

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AOpenText™ Operations Orchestration automates, integrates, and orchestrates any IT process, on cloud or off. Automations use low-code/no-code workflow authoring options. Integrations are done with an API-rich, extensible platform. Centrally orchestrates workflows.N/A
    Pricing
    IBM DevOps DeployOpenText Operations Orchestration
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM DevOps DeployOpenText Operations Orchestration
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    IBM DevOps DeployOpenText Operations Orchestration
    Workload Automation
    Comparison of Workload Automation features of IBM DevOps Deploy and OpenText Operations Orchestration
    Feature
    IBM DevOps Deploy
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText Operations Orchestration
    9.5
    2 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Multi-platform scheduling00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Central monitoring00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Logging00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Alerts and notifications00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Analysis and visualization00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Application integration00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM DevOps DeployOpenText Operations Orchestration
    Small Businesses
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Apache Airflow
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Redwood RunMyJobs
    Score9.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM DevOps DeployOpenText Operations Orchestration
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM DevOps DeployOpenText Operations Orchestration
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    IBM UrbanCode Deploy is excellent for code deployments such as Java, .Net, C++, etc. It can also deploy and run SQLs reasonably well. Where it lacks is the ability for executables, Jars, WARs, EARs, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    The products are being paired by the company with different software to specifically fit multiple scenarios. As a standalone platform, it can answer any task with its build-in content or the ability to create your own content and solution.
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Visual deployment instructions.
    • Inventory management of environments.
    • Component configuration at a granular level with customization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Allows for the quick disconnection of accounts that break our terms of service
    • Seamless integration with our billing system
    • Has the ability to house all member/client account information in one single location
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • IBM UrbanCode Deploy does code deployments easy enough, but configurations or ex deployments are a little more complicated. I work on packaged systems, so most of the code I get is form a vendor that I have to deploy.
    • IBM UebanCode Deploy integration into the mainframe world would be ideal. My company uses Mainframe and OpenSystems technologies, and many times there are dependencies between the deployments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • The product build in portal need to be more flexible
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    It's challenging to get a working knowledge of the product without having someone show you the ropes. Linking components with applications and applications with resource trees and resource trees with application deploys is not intuitive. However, once past that learning curve, the possibilities open up, and things become easier to understand and allow for further granularity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    IBM
    I've not worked directly with IBM UrbanCode Deploy support. My DevOps team administers the environment and deals with that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    Most product works well enough, but none of them combine the non-agent/client approach to automation with an easy to develop mechanism (the drag&drop development approach) This alone put this solution on top of our preferred implantation product list
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Push button deployments.
    • Consistency and ability to focus on other tasks.
    • Required quite a bit of upfront customization with certain web deployments (WebSphere, etc.)
    • Opened the door to other types of deployments and other automation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • If time is money, the time saved by using this all-in-one product has certainly saved time AND money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots