TrustRadius

IBM IMS vs. RocksDB

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM IMS
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
IBM IMS, for Information Management System, is a database and transaction server.N/A
RocksDB
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
RocksDB is an embeddable persistent key-value storage engine written in C++. It stores arbitrary byte-array keys and values in sorted order, supporting direct key lookups, batched retrieval, forward and reverse range scans, and application-defined key ordering. RocksDB uses a log-structured merge-tree (LSM-tree) architecture optimized for solid-state drives (SSDs), flash storage, and other storage environments with high read and write rates. Its capabilities include column families, atomic write…N/A
Pricing
IBM IMSRocksDB
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM IMSRocksDB
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM IMSRocksDB
Considered Both Products
IBM IMS
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose IBM IMS
Essentially, for a question of reliability and scalability, the performance has always been of an enterprise level. The utilities are efficient and effective.
RocksDB

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
IBM IMSRocksDB
Small Businesses
Redis Software
Redis Software
Score 8.8 out of 10
Redis Software
Redis Software
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Redis Software
Redis Software
Score 8.8 out of 10
Redis Software
Redis Software
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Redis Software
Redis Software
Score 8.8 out of 10
Redis Software
Redis Software
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM IMSRocksDB
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM IMSRocksDB
Likelihood to Recommend
We have built a database of a network of bank branches with all the needs of security and recovery/restart. It requires knowledge of obsolete maintenance languages and perhaps it is too rigid in the schemes.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Security
  • Reliability
  • Big volume of data and good performance
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Certainly, not being a DB relational penalizes its use
  • It should be more flexible
  • Open up to more recent languages
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Essentially, for a question of reliability and scalability, the performance has always been of an enterprise level. The utilities are efficient and effective.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • The investment made about 20 years ago that has been fully repaid
  • Reliability and security of investments
  • Unfortunately, it is quite outdated and therefore maintenance costs are higher because the skills are not always available.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots