IBM Integration Bus vs. Interstage

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Integration Bus
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
IBM Integration Bus, replacing the former WebSphere Message Broker, is used to connect applications together, regardless of the message formats or protocols that they support. This connectivity helps to ensure diverse applications can interact and exchange data with other applications in a flexible, dynamic, and extensible infrastructure.N/A
Interstage
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Interstage from Fujitsu is a business operation platform.N/A
Pricing
IBM Integration BusInterstage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Integration BusInterstage
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Integration BusInterstage
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
IBM Integration BusInterstage
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Integration BusInterstage
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Integration BusInterstage
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Routing, protocol transformation, message transformation and service aggregation are very well performed by WebSphere Message Broker (WMB). It is not very suitable for integration with databases.
Read full review
Fujitsu
At the suggestion of the contractor (retailer), who has always entrusted us with the Internet environment, we set up this tower server. The CAL upgrade cost associated with upgrading the file server can be greatly reduced because the StrageServer operating system was given as a line. The operability of remote maintenance was also greatly improved by employing the associated management software (iRMC).
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Graphical data mapper
  • Support for different programming languages
  • Integration with MQ
  • Support for different parsers
Read full review
Fujitsu
  • It has a good user support team
  • The support system that more than makes up for it is the determining factor for the choice.
  • When a RAID disk or power supply failed, the maintenance service alerted me with a monitoring alarm and replaced it quickly before service was interrupted.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Logging
  • Debugging
  • Code quality tools
  • Feature specific installation
Read full review
Fujitsu
  • It has no effect on the run rate because it does everything correctly from detection to replacement before stopping
  • I think a more reliable unit can be used as a server computer.
  • It is more expensive than a model of equal characteristics from a foreign manufacturer.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Websphere message broker supports a lot more protocols than any other similar tool.
Read full review
Fujitsu
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • It helped us in improving the speed to market for our services/APIs.
  • Learning curve is quite long
Read full review
Fujitsu
  • With respect to the backup system, I believe that relocation after the replacement was facilitated.
  • The best solution to the problem was that thanks to Fujitsu Interstage I created a separate cloud to store the data for each individual PC.
  • Being able to continue the tasks, without the interruption of service due to a hardware failure that was fixed very efficiently, demonstrates the quality of this company's operations.
Read full review
ScreenShots