IBM Kubecost vs. Serverless360
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Kubecost | Score7.7 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Kubecost is a self-hosted Kubernetes cost visibility and optimization platform that provides real-time insights to help teams reduce cloud spend and scale cost efficiently. | $449 per month 100 nodes |
Serverless360 | Score10 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Serverless360 is a platform to manage and monitor Azure Serverless components related to enterprise integration. In a real-time scenario, the integrated cloud applications are not built with a single technology stack, it typically involves at least 3 or 4 different Azure Services. Currently, Azure Portal is designed more on vertical technology silos and it's difficult to visualize and manage such connected solutions. So Serverless360 is presented by the vendor as a tool that users can depend on… | N/A |
| IBM Kubecost | Serverless360 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Kubecost | Serverless360 | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 7 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | |
| IBM Kubecost | Serverless360 | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Kubecost | Serverless360 | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Rackspace Fabric Score6.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | IBM Turbonomic Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | IBM Turbonomic Score8.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Kubecost | Serverless360 | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.5 | 10.0 |
| Usability | 7.3 | 10.0 |
| IBM Kubecost | Serverless360 | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Kubecost Screenshots | Serverless360 Screenshots |











