IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities vs. Snapmeter

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities (formerly Tririga) is an integrated workplace management system (IWMS) supporting facilities management, real estate portfolio management, space management, and environmental / energy management.N/A
Snapmeter
Score 0.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Snapmeter is an online tool to help building managers control energy expenses. According to the vendor, understanding and controlling energy costs is a key painpoint Snapmeter aims to solve: On any given day, the pattern of energy use in your building is driven by weather, occupant behavior, and equipment issues. Worse, your utility layers on a web of demand and use charges that vary by time of day, day of week, and season. Sorting out the true cost of your…
$167
For buildings that spend up to $200K a year on energy.
Pricing
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesSnapmeter
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Small Building
$167.00
For buildings that spend up to $200K a year on energy.
Medium Building
$349.00
For buildings that spend between $200K and $1 million a year on energy.
Large Building
$549.00
For buildings that spend more than $1 million a year on energy.
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesSnapmeter
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAll subscriptions include –Unlimited users –Free training –No implementation fees –Add your own submeters for $65 per month Portfolio customers enjoy –Bigger discounts the more buildings you enroll –Personalized support on your energy management goals –Custom analyses –In-person quarterly review meetings
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesSnapmeter
Best Alternatives
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesSnapmeter
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Dotloop
Dotloop
Score 6.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
Condo Control
Condo Control
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesSnapmeter
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Maximo Real Estate and FacilitiesSnapmeter
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
It is great for organizations who have complex data or large amounts of data. For an organization that has small amounts of data or very simple processes TRIRIGA might be too much. It can handle small data and processes but the costs of implementing and supporting might be greater than the reward that would be provided. It also has a lot of room to grow. You can utilize existing forms and business objects or you can custom build new ones to fit business needs.
Read full review
Gridium
No answers on this topic
Pros
IBM
  • Diverse categories of requests available
  • Ability to be as descriptive as possible without character limit
  • Ease of mass resource assignment for tasks
  • Ease of mass maintenance task/request printing work orders
  • Clean site layout that is easy to navigate
Read full review
Gridium
No answers on this topic
Cons
IBM
  • In order to get into the back end and manage spaces, there are too many "clicks" and pop up boxes to get to the area that is needed, which causes delays and confusions.
  • It can be a bit slow when processing requests, pulling up maps.
  • Trigia holds a lot of information, which is good but it could be easier to get to at times.
Read full review
Gridium
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
I give it this rating because it has more than one way to get to most forms but it can be hard to navigate if you don't know the terms TRIRIGA uses. Also being a new developer can bring up issues with not knowing exactly where certain things are found. The documentation doesn't help too much sometimes since the TRIRIGA community is pretty small.
Read full review
Gridium
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
IBM
In the almost 7 months I have been working on my current project there has been exactly one unplanned outage. This was in the QA environment during data migration and was caused by a workflow that was circular and self referencing which caused the processing JAVA memory to spike, not resolve and then crash the server.
Read full review
Gridium
No answers on this topic
Performance
IBM
TRIRIGA does a good job of this, being a server based web application it is like other web based systems so it's not as fast as a client server application or a local system but it is very consistent across locations and for different roles and employees. This does allow consistent use no matter where people are located. It also does a fair job of notifying the user when it is loading with the spinning circle or hour glass. The reports can get fairly complex but native TRIRIGA reports perform well even when they are complex. They can be a little slow if they are fetching 100's of 1000's of rows but this doesn't take more than 10 or so seconds. I have yet to write a native report that takes more than 20 seconds and that 20 second report is getting data from 4 BO's and nets over 130K rows.
Read full review
Gridium
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
The process does seem to take some time and has to go through a preset escalation process. IBM does a good job of communicating through the process, it just seems to take it's natural course.
Read full review
Gridium
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
IBM
Do research on the client processes and determine which modules need to be implemented and in which order they should be implemented in.
Read full review
Gridium
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Much faster web based program with more category options and ease of mass batch printing.
Read full review
Gridium
No answers on this topic
Scalability
IBM
TRIRIGA can be split into many servers and is easily scaled over multiple environments. TRIRIGA is also capable of being implemented on multiple operating systems and a wide range of environments with different database management systems. This makes it easy for clients to choose since they can choose vendors they have previous relationships with or are required to use for various reasons.
Read full review
Gridium
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • It's a positive and works well with the business.
  • It doesn't "stand out" from competitors but has great potential if updates were establisthed.
  • The pros outweigh the cons when using Tririga.
Read full review
Gridium
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Snapmeter Screenshots

Screenshot of Turn your building’s energy data into savings.Screenshot of Bite­-sized diagnostics delivered in a weekly email gives your team actionable feedback to identify issues and capture savings. And don’t drown in data. Snapmeter’s load curve beacons help you spot operational savings opportunities.Screenshot of Ensure your team gets the credit for lower use or better demand management, even when rates are up, the bill period is long, or the weather is clouding the picture. Snapmeter peers in to your bills and can even capture demand savings from energy storage systems or demand response.