IBM Secure Gateway vs. Netskope NextGen SWG

Datapower external connectivity is made easy with built-in client provisions in gateway servers. [There are] other use cases if you need to access resources in IBM Cloud with enterprise connectivity setup.

Incentivized

Scenarios Well Suited - Replace On Premises Proxies - Control Work from Home users - Data Loss Prevention to data storage in cloud services - Control could be applied to the most used type of operate systems ( Windows, MAC, IOS adn Android) Scenarios Less Appropriate - Shared Devices - Access to the Internal Applications

Incentivized

• Ease of setup
• Integrated Datapower clients
• Console based management in IBM Cloud

Incentivized

• Control Web Traffic
• SSL Decrypt
• Control Web 2.0
• Threat Protection
• DLP

Incentivized

• Product documentation on setting up various client use cases
• Flexible plan
• Deployment options beyond saas

Incentivized

• Reporting
• Integration with Azure AD
• Deploy Procedure

Incentivized

The netskope next gen swg win the evaluation process in the follow features: - Better Deploy process - Don't depend of a VPN connection - Native SSL Decryption - WebUI of easy and quickly understanding - Device compliance evaluation - Flexible Scenarios of Deployment - A private network what connect more efficiently to the most used SaaS Services

Incentivized

• Was able to quickly set up vpn tunnel with our IBM Cloud resources access. That helped to get quick time to market.

Incentivized

• Complete Control of Web access regardless the location of user
• Deep Application control ( Eg. Allow access just the company tenant of a SaaS App)
• No Restrictions about the device type ( Eg. Windows, MAC and mobiles)

Incentivized